This petition is designed for fans of both Ian Hunter and the late Mick Ronson to partake in favour to have this great concert finally released on DVD.

Bright­ness, con­trast, image qual­ity, depth of field are all sac­ri­ficed to accom­mo­date a gimmick. Plus movie theaters often give 3-D better treatment, usually offering 3-D versions of films two screens, while the 2-D version only get one screen.

The latest casualty of this 3-D trend is G.I. Joe Retaliation, it was originally scheduled to be released on June 29th, but Paramount abruptly decided to delay it's release until March 2013 to convert it to 3-D, citing focus groups asking why the film wasn't in stereo. But it's clear the real reason for Paramounts sudden decision is due to the lackluster performance of Battleship at the box-office and wanting to stretch out consumers pockets more to maximize they're profits.

This decision is a bad idea for many reasons, first off, 3-D showings usually take in less revenue compared to 2-D ones, even for a hugely successful film like Deathly Hallows part 2, 3-D showings accounted for less then half of the film's profits(48% to be precise), films like The Avengers are the exception and not the rule.

Delaying Retaliation and giving it an unnecessary conversion will most likely cause it to lose more money then it will gain. Not only will fans be turned off by the 3-D conversion, releasing the film in March next year would be even worse then releasing it a week before Amazing Spider Man, by next year, the excitement for the film will have died down, and the poor performance of John Carter earlier this year proved that March is not a good time to release a film intended for the blockbuster season.

All of these things combined will pretty much guarantee Retaliation will flop, and even if it is a success in spite of all this, the money it makes more then likely won't be enough to offset the costs of conversion. Bottom line, the film has more to lose then to gain with the delay. Hasbro will also be affected, as the tie-ie merchandise for the film was scheduled months in advance, the sudden delay will likely end up costing Hasbro quite a bit of money, they won't take this snap decision lightly and neither should you.

South Africa a highly racialized society which is plagued with the legacy of apartheid, which was an assault on the human dignity of African people. That trauma is identical to that suffered by the African Diaspora. Despite South Africa's claims at creating a new South Africa for all, the media remains largely distant from content that empowers the African majority. It white wash issues of race and self-determination leaving the people with deep internalize feelings of self-hatred and self-ignorance.

The sequel to 500 Years Later is Motherland which deals with the most concise story of Africa. Despite even having in the South African president all attempts to license this film to the national broadcaster are ignored.

Due to personal issues with the production company, my nephew had to walk away in post-production. However, since he was instrumental in bringing a community together to create HOMEBOUND, we would request a copy of the movie for one day so that he can share it with the residents, including family and friends of El Campo, Texas with a personal screening. As such, he would be able to personally thank his community for coming together to help a small town film maker realize a dream and celebrate with all those who made the film possible.

Everyone is anxious to see the work of the community of El Campo, Texas now that the film has been completed.

It will be absolutely selfish and stupid of Sony if they will recast Sienna as Jill because she is a HUGE fan favourite in the 'Resident Evil' community. Recasting Sienna will clearly indicate that Sony has no respect towards to the passionate fans that have been yearning for years to see Sienna return once again in a lead role in a 'Resident Evil' sequel. Sony Pictures MUST realise that if they do go ahead with the recasting, it will end up being THE killer blow to the franchise because every living fan will be too devastasted to go and see RE5 thus the movie will have a HIGH chance of performing miserably at the box office. We will be feeling too hurt as well as we will not have any faith to support the movie. Sony Pictures needs to wake up by realising that it is not all just about what the studio wants but also what the FANS want.

The success of RE5 will depend on the availability of Sienna Guillory because she is such an intergal to the franchise. Sienna is so important to the franchise that the franchise itself is at risk of losing the majority of the fans that have supported the movies throughout the years. Thus, Sony must not recast Sienna in order to avoid a massive fan outrage! It will be an act of betrayal if Sienna ends up getting flicked off the set. This will be perceived as unprofessional and rude because she has been training heavily for MONTHS to get in shape for the physically-demanding role, as well as she has been officially signed on to return since March. It is not considered as moral to ignore/recast Sienna who happens to be a very loyal fan to 'Resident Evil'.

It is your choice, Sony. Do you want to see the franchise hit a new low or see the franchise hit a new high? Also, do you want the fans and moviegoers to forever hold a grudge towards to your company? It is best not to give yourself a bad reputation. By the way, this petition is NOT the sole evidence of Sienna's popularity. Fans have expressed their disgust, anger, disappointment countless of times on Twitter and the rage continues to grow by the minute.

Please for the sake of living up to the fans' dream of seeing Sienna returning once again as the badass Jill Valentine well as to keep the future of the franchise remained intact, do NOT recast Sienna! End of story.

During this time the festival has played a vital cultural role, bringing audiences together to debate and discuss an extraordinary diversity of important work. It provides a space and platform for emerging talent, for provocative and political films, for innovation. Very little of this filmmaking can be seen in the UK outside of the festival. The BFI is to be congratulated for 25 years of commitment.

However, this year’s festival will be a shadow of its former self, with a radically cut-down programme of 6 days, rather than 14 and a substantial reduction of the activities and facilities that have made it an internationally acclaimed event. Of particular concern is the loss of the annual tour of festival highlights that ensured that the festival was enjoyed by audiences across the UK.

With 15% cuts to funding as a result of the government’s spending review, the BFI is necessarily having to tighten its belt. As such it’s understandable that some cuts need to be made to its activities. However, we are deeply concerned that the substantial cuts WELL ABOVE 15% to the 2011 festival will hinder this year's success and are a move towards the BFI severing its responsibilities for the event. Few festivals thrive - or indeed survive - without the support and commitment of a major cultural body. If the BFI was to drop the LLGFF we fear for its future.

Furthermore, we understand that the BFI will reviewing the future of the festival in April after the 2011 event and we urge Amanda Nevill (amanda.nevill@bfi.org.uk) Greg Dyke (greg.dyke@bfi.org.uk) and Board of Governors at BFI, Ed Vaizey (vaizeye@parliament.uk) and Boris Johnson (mayor@london.gov.uk) to ensure that:

The BFI commits to organising and hosting the annual LLGFF as an integral part of its cultural programme.

The BFI commits to ensure that the festival reaches out to audiences across the UK through a tour of cinemas or by making films available through its online platforms.

The BFI explores ways to reduce expenditure while maintaining the integrity of the festival’s programme, and in particular safeguards such vital elements as length of programme, pay for the festival curators, some industry services, and a budget to help filmmakers attend the Festival to present their work.

The BFI explores new avenues for support from individual donors.

The BFI considers the impact on its own membership base (25% of BFI members book tickets for the LLGFF) if it was to drop the festival.

The Mob Film Co. is currently filming an adaptation of Going Postal.

The City Watch story arc is one of the longest story arcs of the Discworld book series.

Their supposed ultimate goal is to share these unique films with the West; that they enjoy the culture exchange, but really they don't care and actually believe they can make the original movies better (but we all know the remakes are horribly worse). If they really wanted to share these movies, wouldn't they just subtitle them instead of writing an entirely new script?

This is a petition for people who want to see the end to the butchery and disappointing remakes of Asian films.

The remakes are not only a disappointment to movie critics and movie fans alike, but they also cause the fans of the originals to become less of fans because the atrocious remakes leave a bad taste in the mouth, so to speak.