Against the Proposed Travellers site next to Derwent School Petition: Signature List Feed

mr melvyn houghton [Signature #171]

Tue, 1 Jun 2010 04:44:25 UTC

mr melvyn houghton, lower stondon

i woul like to know why when we asked the council to provide us with land for allotments we were told that there was no available land in the area as we asked first i feel that we should have first refusal

Miss Gillian Love [Signature #170]

Thu, 27 May 2010 03:57:12 UTC

Miss Gillian Love, Lower Stondon

Miss Elizabeth Mortimer [Signature #169]

Mon, 24 May 2010 06:00:36 UTC

Miss Elizabeth Mortimer, Lower Stondon

In my opinion, the proposed travellor site in such a small, rural community will be a negative move for Lower Stondon/Henlow and also for the potential travellors who may find intergration, into a small population, difficult.

mr edward hobart [Signature #168]

Sun, 23 May 2010 05:31:33 UTC

mr edward hobart, henlow

Mr Luke Fensome [Signature #167]

Sat, 22 May 2010 07:54:47 UTC

Mr Luke Fensome, Lower Stondon

Mr Allen Stephens [Signature #166]

Thu, 20 May 2010 07:12:22 UTC

Mr Allen Stephens, Henlow, Beds

I Object to this proposal.

Mr Richard Clarke [Signature #165]

Thu, 20 May 2010 06:04:50 UTC

Mr Richard Clarke, RAF Henlow

Mr John Cockrill [Signature #164]

Thu, 20 May 2010 05:47:17 UTC

Mr John Cockrill, RAF Henlow

Miss Natalie Winter [Signature #163]

Thu, 20 May 2010 05:11:29 UTC

Miss Natalie Winter, Henlow

Absolutely ridiculous!!!! A gypsy site next to a lower school? And a military base? In a tiny village? NO WAY!!! Properties will lose money, the area will be terrorised! We cannot support them here, put them where they can cause no disturbance to the local population.

Mt Trevor Broggi [Signature #162]

Wed, 12 May 2010 01:50:08 UTC

Mt Trevor Broggi, Henlow

Anonymous [Signature #161]

Tue, 11 May 2010 06:23:53 UTC

Anonymous, Sandy

Mr Jonathan Hall [Signature #160]

Sun, 9 May 2010 12:29:12 UTC

Mr Jonathan Hall, Henlow

Mrs Lisa Hall [Signature #159]

Sun, 9 May 2010 11:19:08 UTC

Mrs Lisa Hall, Henlow

I feel that the infrastructure of Henlow would not cope with any more dwellings/increased population. Many of the local schools, doctors, NHS dentists are already overscribed and this would add further burden to the system. I would also question whether siting a traveller site next to a lower school is in the best interests of the school.

Mr Alan Smith [Signature #158]

Wed, 5 May 2010 05:59:09 UTC

Mr Alan Smith, Broadstairs

Mr Edward Lincoln [Signature #157]

Wed, 5 May 2010 04:07:55 UTC

Mr Edward Lincoln, lower stondon

Mr David Pearce [Signature #156]

Tue, 4 May 2010 01:37:29 UTC

Mr David Pearce, Lower Stondon

WE DO NOT WANT THIS TRAVELLERS SITE ON OUR DOORSTEP. PUT IT ON THE DOORSTEP OF THE HEAD OF THE COUNCIL AND SEE IF THEY WOULD BE HAPPY TO ACCOMADATE THEM.

Mrs Pauline Russell [Signature #155]

Tue, 4 May 2010 01:51:33 UTC

Mrs Pauline Russell, Henlow

Mr Alan Russell [Signature #154]

Tue, 4 May 2010 01:48:28 UTC

Mr Alan Russell, Henlow

Miss Kate Smith [Signature #153]

Mon, 3 May 2010 03:42:05 UTC

Miss Kate Smith, Henlow

Mr Nick Taylor [Signature #152]

Mon, 3 May 2010 03:40:16 UTC

Mr Nick Taylor, Henlow

Mr Brian King [Signature #151]

Mon, 3 May 2010 02:57:35 UTC

Mr Brian King, Henlow

Mrs Anonymous [Signature #150]

Mon, 3 May 2010 01:15:20 UTC

Anonymous, Shortstown

I feel it is inappropriate to place such a site so close to a Lower school.

mr ron Waldock [Signature #149]

Mon, 3 May 2010 11:31:34 UTC

mr ron Waldock, Lower Stondon

This seem to recipe for trouble. How can the local authoroties even be thinking of putting a site near a school and a RAF base?
Is this just a case of being seen to do the right thing as well as being politically correct?

Mrs Anonymous [Signature #148]

Mon, 3 May 2010 04:54:14 UTC

Anonymous, HENLOW

Too near School and militaty base, can see fighting breaking out between off duty airmen and travellers, especially after a few beers etc.

Mrs Anonymous [Signature #147]

Sun, 2 May 2010 10:42:06 UTC

Anonymous, Meppershall

Mr Anonymous [Signature #146]

Sun, 2 May 2010 10:39:16 UTC

Anonymous, Meppershall

Mr Chris Huckle [Signature #145]

Sun, 2 May 2010 03:26:35 UTC

Mr Chris Huckle, Lower stondon

Michael Cocozza [Signature #144]

Sun, 2 May 2010 03:22:25 UTC

Michael Cocozza, Bedford

A lovely rural area like this cannot be ruined with these people. They will become a stain on the landscape and cause much disruption and annoyance to many people.

Miss Tara Martin [Signature #143]

Sun, 2 May 2010 03:17:38 UTC

Miss Tara Martin, Lower stondon

Mr Anonymous [Signature #142]

Sat, 1 May 2010 10:54:21 UTC

Anonymous, Lower Stondon

Mr Michael Tosdevin [Signature #141]

Sat, 1 May 2010 10:05:32 UTC

Mr Michael Tosdevin, Lower Stondon

I object to a travellers site at the proposed location because: 1 Commercial activity, animals & noise next to school. 2 Additional load on already stretched Stondon surgery. 3 Extra cars turning onto a major road (particularly dangerous next to school). 4 Detrimental impact on view and impression as visitors approach Lower Stondon. 5 Cost to make the site habitable (prone to flooding) would take resources away from the community. 6 Site better use to provide much-needed allotments.

Mrs Susan Steed [Signature #140]

Sat, 1 May 2010 05:31:30 UTC

Mrs Susan Steed, Lower Stondon

To site a Gypsy camp next door to a school seems to be asking for trouble.

Mr Ian Steed [Signature #139]

Sat, 1 May 2010 05:29:16 UTC

Mr Ian Steed, Lower Stondon

To site a camp in this area is not a good idea.

Mrs Anonymous [Signature #138]

Sat, 1 May 2010 03:40:06 UTC

Anonymous, Arlesey

Mr Aidan Kearney [Signature #137]

Sat, 1 May 2010 12:37:45 UTC

Mr Aidan Kearney, Lower Stondon

Mrs Hayley Kearney [Signature #136]

Sat, 1 May 2010 12:36:32 UTC

Mrs Hayley Kearney, Lower Stondon

mrs christine howard [Signature #135]

Fri, 30 Apr 2010 04:05:09 UTC

mrs christine howard, shefford

Mr David Jones [Signature #134]

Fri, 30 Apr 2010 01:28:18 UTC

Mr David Jones, Henlow

mrs julie connell [Signature #133]

Thu, 29 Apr 2010 04:51:30 UTC

mrs julie connell, Shefford

Mr John Mullins [Signature #132]

Thu, 29 Apr 2010 01:24:10 UTC

Mr John Mullins, Lower Stondon

Mrs Catherine Mullins [Signature #131]

Thu, 29 Apr 2010 01:21:56 UTC

Mrs Catherine Mullins, Lower Stondon

Mr Robert Murrell [Signature #130]

Thu, 29 Apr 2010 12:14:47 UTC

Mr Robert Murrell, Hitchin

Mrs Claire Gardner [Signature #129]

Thu, 29 Apr 2010 12:14:03 UTC

Mrs Claire Gardner, lower stondon

Mr Sandra Gardner [Signature #128]

Thu, 29 Apr 2010 12:13:29 UTC

Mr Sandra Gardner, lower stondon

Mr Stuart Gardner [Signature #127]

Thu, 29 Apr 2010 12:13:11 UTC

Mr Stuart Gardner, lower stondon

Miss Tracey Gardner [Signature #126]

Thu, 29 Apr 2010 12:12:26 UTC

Miss Tracey Gardner, lower stondon

MISS VANESSA CHERRY [Signature #125]

Thu, 29 Apr 2010 11:16:34 UTC

MISS VANESSA CHERRY, HENLOW

Anonymous [Signature #124]

Wed, 28 Apr 2010 07:27:59 UTC

Anonymous, Henlow

miss s coates [Signature #123]

Tue, 27 Apr 2010 01:33:45 UTC

miss s coates, Lower Stondon

Mrs Anonymous [Signature #122]

Thu, 22 Apr 2010 12:25:10 UTC

Anonymous, Henlow

mrs joan hunter [Signature #121]

Thu, 22 Apr 2010 11:30:40 UTC

mrs joan hunter, henlow

Hilary Adams [Signature #120]

Thu, 22 Apr 2010 09:03:41 UTC

Hilary Adams, Henlow

mr trevor Gunn [Signature #119]

Thu, 22 Apr 2010 03:52:06 UTC

mr trevor Gunn, Henlow

mrs jennifer Gunn [Signature #118]

Thu, 22 Apr 2010 03:45:32 UTC

mrs jennifer Gunn, Henlow

Ms Anonymous [Signature #117]

Wed, 21 Apr 2010 05:04:07 UTC

Anonymous, Henlow

Ms Anonymous [Signature #116]

Wed, 21 Apr 2010 05:03:16 UTC

Anonymous, Henlow

mr joseph rainbow [Signature #115]

Mon, 19 Apr 2010 10:40:37 UTC

mr joseph rainbow, henlow

mrs mary rainbow [Signature #114]

Mon, 19 Apr 2010 06:27:53 UTC

mrs mary rainbow, henlow

Miss Monika Schubertova [Signature #113]

Sun, 18 Apr 2010 02:01:34 UTC

Miss Monika Schubertova, Lower Stondon

Ms Anonymous [Signature #112]

Sat, 17 Apr 2010 06:09:53 UTC

Anonymous, Henlow

Mrs Anonymous [Signature #111]

Sat, 17 Apr 2010 06:08:55 UTC

Anonymous, Henlow

Mr Anonymous [Signature #110]

Sat, 17 Apr 2010 06:08:21 UTC

Anonymous, Henlow

Mr R Downs [Signature #109]

Fri, 16 Apr 2010 05:04:42 UTC

Mr R Downs, Lower stondon

Ms bonnie satterthwaite [Signature #108]

Thu, 15 Apr 2010 05:54:54 UTC

Ms bonnie satterthwaite, Henlow

1) it should be placed on a brown field site not a greenfield site.

2) it should not be placed next to the school or airfield site.

mrs michelle lewandowski [Signature #107]

Wed, 14 Apr 2010 01:18:24 UTC

mrs michelle lewandowski, lower stondon

Mrs Michelle Sherman [Signature #106]

Wed, 14 Apr 2010 09:00:00 UTC

Mrs Michelle Sherman, henlow

The effect it will have on the primary school and local amenties.

Miss Anonymous [Signature #105]

Tue, 13 Apr 2010 03:08:57 UTC

Anonymous, Lower Stondon

mr stuart sherman [Signature #104]

Tue, 13 Apr 2010 06:20:50 UTC

mr stuart sherman, henlow

Primary school children should NOT be anywhere near a Gypsy camp, let alone spending every schoolday next to one.

Mrs Pat Stebbings [Signature #103]

Tue, 13 Apr 2010 02:27:15 UTC

Mrs Pat Stebbings, Henlow

Mr Anonymous [Signature #102]

Mon, 12 Apr 2010 04:58:03 UTC

Anonymous, Lower Stondon

Mr Lee Gale [Signature #101]

Mon, 12 Apr 2010 04:36:21 UTC

Mr Lee Gale, Henlow, Bedfordshire

Henlow and Stondon have been overdeveloped over the past 5 years. We have seen numerous accident on this road as we live in the middle of the hitchin road. Cars travel fast and try to overtake and all the council have done is put up a 50 speed limit sign. (had no effect). Adding a travels site next to a school can only cause more accidents and right outside a children school where lorries and caravan will be trying to pull in. This site will cost a lot of money to develop.

Mrs Allison Gale [Signature #100]

Mon, 12 Apr 2010 04:03:34 UTC

Mrs Allison Gale, Henlow, Bedfordshire

Very strongly opposed. My Husband and I have worked hard all our life and the travellers sites will be on the same road as ours, this will devalue our house as people do not want to live or buy a house by these sites. We own a little bit of the farm land on the other side of the road which have restrictions of no caravans and building. If the council therefore allows travellers to build then equality should mean that we should also be able to build on the land.

Mrs Marion Moore [Signature #99]

Mon, 12 Apr 2010 02:21:08 UTC

Mrs Marion Moore, Lower Stondon

Mr Anonymous [Signature #98]

Mon, 12 Apr 2010 01:07:53 UTC

Anonymous, Henlow

Mr Andrew Dionisyou [Signature #97]

Sun, 11 Apr 2010 10:27:27 UTC

Mr Andrew Dionisyou, Henlow

Mr Martyn Beazley [Signature #96]

Sun, 11 Apr 2010 05:52:45 UTC

Mr Martyn Beazley, Henlow

I have concerns over the site being used safely for the purposes detailed. I have concerns over the expense of making this site suitable. I have serious concerns over building a site such as this right next to a School where my children are likely to attend.

mr stuart mitchell [Signature #95]

Sat, 10 Apr 2010 08:07:59 UTC

mr stuart mitchell, lower stondon

Mr Andrew Williams [Signature #94]

Fri, 9 Apr 2010 07:15:20 UTC

Mr Andrew Williams, Lower Stondon

Miss Cheryl Preston [Signature #93]

Fri, 9 Apr 2010 02:29:04 UTC

Miss Cheryl Preston, Lower Stondon

Mr Craig Jackson-Dyke [Signature #92]

Thu, 8 Apr 2010 06:13:38 UTC

Mr Craig Jackson-Dyke, HENLOW

Mr Faye Hornsby [Signature #91]

Tue, 6 Apr 2010 02:01:11 UTC

Mr Faye Hornsby, Lower Stondon

Mr Russell Hornsby [Signature #90]

Tue, 6 Apr 2010 02:00:14 UTC

Mr Russell Hornsby, Lower Stondon

Placing a large community of people next to the lowerschool in our small community is madness. Place these sites alongside of communities that can consume travillers not small villages that will be dominated by them.

Mr & Mrs Narinder & Gurchran Virdee [Signature #89]

Sun, 4 Apr 2010 10:42:19 UTC

Mr & Mrs Narinder & Gurchran Virdee, Henlow

mrs Denise Bloomfield [Signature #88]

Sat, 3 Apr 2010 11:45:30 UTC

mrs Denise Bloomfield, Henlow

Mrs Louise Jennings [Signature #87]

Fri, 2 Apr 2010 08:14:43 UTC

Mrs Louise Jennings, Lower Stondon

Mr Lloyd Jennings [Signature #86]

Fri, 2 Apr 2010 08:14:13 UTC

Mr Lloyd Jennings, Lower Stondon

Mr Lewis Jennings [Signature #85]

Fri, 2 Apr 2010 08:13:36 UTC

Mr Lewis Jennings, Lower Stondon

Mr Paul Jennings [Signature #84]

Fri, 2 Apr 2010 08:12:37 UTC

Mr Paul Jennings, Lower Stondon

mr Anonymous [Signature #83]

Wed, 31 Mar 2010 03:44:12 UTC

Anonymous, Henlow

No to this ridiculas proposal - to close to the RAF base and school - no sane person has considered this site in a clear frame of mind. The council are just filling quotas. For sanity sake think this one out Beds Council. There are inadequate facilities in the local communities to support a travellers site such as this proposal.

miss kellie barnett [Signature #82]

Wed, 31 Mar 2010 03:29:38 UTC

miss kellie barnett, Henlow

There are insufficient facilities for existing residents without another increase in homes in this small comunity. The main road of the proposed site is unsafe. Travellers say themselves they want to be within walking distance of local shops & facilities there are insufficient here for them. The schools in the area surely cannot cope within even more children and the doctors are at bursting point - try getting an appointment. This cannot be allowed to go ahead.

Mrs Valerie Claydon [Signature #81]

Wed, 31 Mar 2010 06:36:53 UTC

Mrs Valerie Claydon, Lower Stondon

Miss Ria Haley [Signature #80]

Mon, 29 Mar 2010 01:48:40 UTC

Miss Ria Haley, henlow

Mrs Barbara Cobb [Signature #79]

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:20:55 UTC

Mrs Barbara Cobb, Henlow

If this agricultural land is to be sacrificed it should be kept for future use or expansion of Derwent Lower School.
The site is currently farmed why take it out of agricultural use?
A new road entrance this close to the school entrance will be dangerous to both traffic and children. Particularly with towed caravans and commecial vehicles pulling across the footpath.

Ms Lucy Chappell [Signature #78]

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 07:21:15 UTC

Ms Lucy Chappell, Biggleswade

I work in Lower Stondon and feel that the site would be detrimental to the area.

Mr Anonymous [Signature #77]

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 06:52:35 UTC

Anonymous, Lower Stondon

Our town is not a dumping ground, these travellers havent earnt the land that the council are proposing to give them so why not give them some land away from people who pay.

If this goes through Ill expect it'll knock value off our houses and who will reimburse us for that? no one, and I cant afford it.

Mr Paul Woodhead [Signature #76]

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 05:09:19 UTC

Mr Paul Woodhead, Lower Stondon

Mrs Anonymous [Signature #75]

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 04:53:58 UTC

Anonymous, Lower Stondon

Do not agree that Lower Stondon has the capacity to accept a new development regardless of whether it is a travellers site or a new housing.

miss michelle newton [Signature #74]

Wed, 24 Mar 2010 11:13:25 UTC

miss michelle newton, clifton

Mr Martin Wilson [Signature #73]

Mon, 22 Mar 2010 03:35:20 UTC

Mr Martin Wilson, Lower Stondon

miss Anonymous [Signature #72]

Sun, 21 Mar 2010 09:46:46 UTC

Anonymous, henlow

If they are travellers, they should TRAVEL AWAY, not get a site to stay. The wellbeing of children at the school is being put at risk for the sake of political corectness.