No to Yellowsham! Petition: Signature List Feed http://www.gopetition.com/signatures/no-to-yellowsham.html Online petition signatures en-us Thu, 9 Apr 2026 07:35 UTC GoPetition RSS Feed Generator Copyright 2026 GoPetition Mercedes Garcia [Signature #187] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6973344?utm_medium=rss I strongly object to the planning permission for a Big Yellow warehouse facility at 155 Lewisham Way.
I also object to any further proposals for a Big Yellow or any other storage facility on this site and would like any new development to preserve jobs and benefit the people of Lewisham.

]]> Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:11:35 UTC 6973344 Miss Mercedez Mires [Signature #186] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6966213?utm_medium=rss I don't want anything of the sort in my immediate area. Something like the Big Yellow Storage company should be placed on a proper industrial estate, not on a local road with local businesses where it will be misplaced, ugly, bad for local people and businesses.

WE DO NOT WANT IT OR ANYTHING SIMILAR AROUND HERE. PLEASE TAKE NOTE!!!

]]> Tue, 9 Feb 2010 09:43:25 UTC 6966213 Mr Daniel Cambuzat [Signature #185] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6643052?utm_medium=rss Mon, 7 Dec 2009 01:10:23 UTC 6643052 Mrs Mary Barrie [Signature #184] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6495132?utm_medium=rss Mon, 16 Nov 2009 05:32:07 UTC 6495132 Mr Frank Barrie [Signature #183] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6495126?utm_medium=rss Mon, 16 Nov 2009 05:31:11 UTC 6495126 mr James Marsh [Signature #182] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6474151?utm_medium=rss Fri, 13 Nov 2009 01:38:49 UTC 6474151 ms Lauren Shanley [Signature #181] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6474150?utm_medium=rss Fri, 13 Nov 2009 01:37:01 UTC 6474150 Mr David Reeve [Signature #180] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6470121?utm_medium=rss Thu, 12 Nov 2009 03:13:56 UTC 6470121 Mrs Sophie Wheeler [Signature #179] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6443758?utm_medium=rss Mon, 9 Nov 2009 11:53:44 UTC 6443758 Mrs Gwen Batchelor [Signature #178] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6442139?utm_medium=rss Mon, 9 Nov 2009 08:22:16 UTC 6442139 Mr Martin Harland [Signature #177] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6441475?utm_medium=rss It is a totally unsuitable building for that location. Also there are currently small businesses present at that location and in this current economic climate they should be looked after by Lewisham Council and not destroyed by the will of big business. This application should be unanimously refused by the planning committee.

]]> Mon, 9 Nov 2009 06:31:45 UTC 6441475 MS Denise Walshe [Signature #176] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6440959?utm_medium=rss Mon, 9 Nov 2009 04:52:21 UTC 6440959 Mr James Wild [Signature #175] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6436861?utm_medium=rss This building is wholly innapropriate for its setting. It is unnatractive and will stand out on the street. Lewisham Council should block this application.

]]> Sun, 8 Nov 2009 07:24:36 UTC 6436861 Anonymous [Signature #174] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6436542?utm_medium=rss Sun, 8 Nov 2009 05:01:51 UTC 6436542 Ms Anne Clarke [Signature #173] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6434366?utm_medium=rss Sat, 7 Nov 2009 11:07:15 UTC 6434366 mr william muckell [Signature #172] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6434357?utm_medium=rss Sat, 7 Nov 2009 11:01:30 UTC 6434357 ms Anonymous [Signature #171] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6434348?utm_medium=rss Sat, 7 Nov 2009 10:58:33 UTC 6434348 Ms Carol Qiuast [Signature #170] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6433637?utm_medium=rss Sat, 7 Nov 2009 06:04:12 UTC 6433637 Mr Kevin McNicholas [Signature #169] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6431896?utm_medium=rss We have sufficent storage space in SE London.

]]> Fri, 6 Nov 2009 03:07:04 UTC 6431896 Ms Maureen Oswald [Signature #168] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6431430?utm_medium=rss Fri, 6 Nov 2009 12:26:55 UTC 6431430 Mr Spencer Barnshaw [Signature #167] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6431426?utm_medium=rss Fri, 6 Nov 2009 12:26:15 UTC 6431426 Ms Michele McClarren [Signature #166] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6430624?utm_medium=rss Fri, 6 Nov 2009 08:05:06 UTC 6430624 Miss Tam Langley [Signature #165] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6430597?utm_medium=rss Fri, 6 Nov 2009 07:57:07 UTC 6430597 Ms Sarah Croall [Signature #164] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6428212?utm_medium=rss Thu, 5 Nov 2009 02:32:50 UTC 6428212 Miss Dyne Hudson [Signature #163] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6428009?utm_medium=rss Certain parts of Lewisham Way are really attractive, whereas other areas are truly depressing. Let's hope the council continues with its objection and provides some money to enhance this road. Some trees would not go amiss.

]]> Thu, 5 Nov 2009 01:37:42 UTC 6428009 Mrs Jo Caseby [Signature #162] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6427812?utm_medium=rss This seems totally at odds with Lewisham Council's aims to regenerate the area and draw people in by creating a thriving residential and small business community. Big yellow storage is a demand that should be satisfied out of town.

]]> Thu, 5 Nov 2009 12:47:51 UTC 6427812 Mr Bryan Savery [Signature #161] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6426708?utm_medium=rss Thu, 5 Nov 2009 08:21:18 UTC 6426708 Mr Cedric Pierce [Signature #160] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6425590?utm_medium=rss I have nothing against Big Yellow but this area is the preserve of small businesses providing local jobs, and anyway a large warehouse structure is completely out of character with the architecture and "feel" for the area.

]]> Thu, 5 Nov 2009 03:00:35 UTC 6425590 Ms J C Muff [Signature #159] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6424592?utm_medium=rss This building will not be in keeping with the area.

]]> Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:30:10 UTC 6424592 Miss Shelley Thomas [Signature #158] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6421948?utm_medium=rss I disagree with the location of Big Yellow as oposed to any concern over the company. This will have a negative impact on cultural/historical value of the area and could result in significant job losses connected to local business in the area at a hard economic time.

]]> Wed, 4 Nov 2009 08:50:56 UTC 6421948 Ms barbara cowell [Signature #157] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6421740?utm_medium=rss Won't fit into the area nor add anything to it.

]]> Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:28:23 UTC 6421740 Anonymous [Signature #156] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6421728?utm_medium=rss Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:22:28 UTC 6421728 Mrs Mary Brodrick [Signature #155] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6421489?utm_medium=rss Wed, 4 Nov 2009 05:55:46 UTC 6421489 Mr Gerald Koessl [Signature #154] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6421311?utm_medium=rss Wed, 4 Nov 2009 04:50:20 UTC 6421311 Rodney Pinder [Signature #153] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6421193?utm_medium=rss Preserve small business, the backbone of the nation. Stop this now!

]]> Wed, 4 Nov 2009 04:06:22 UTC 6421193 Mr Hock Lim [Signature #152] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6421016?utm_medium=rss Wed, 4 Nov 2009 03:06:08 UTC 6421016 Miss Helen McIntosh [Signature #151] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6420955?utm_medium=rss I object to the Big Yellow storage replacing existing work units for businesses.

]]> Wed, 4 Nov 2009 02:45:42 UTC 6420955 Ms Helen Thomas [Signature #150] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6420924?utm_medium=rss Wed, 4 Nov 2009 02:32:26 UTC 6420924 Ms Gillian Delahunty [Signature #149] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6420798?utm_medium=rss Wed, 4 Nov 2009 01:38:56 UTC 6420798 Mr David Easton [Signature #148] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6420783?utm_medium=rss Wed, 4 Nov 2009 01:31:20 UTC 6420783 Miss Sonia Copland [Signature #147] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6419328?utm_medium=rss Tue, 3 Nov 2009 04:20:17 UTC 6419328 Ms Abiola Onatade [Signature #146] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6418668?utm_medium=rss Tue, 3 Nov 2009 01:50:32 UTC 6418668 Miss Carol Bustard [Signature #145] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6418270?utm_medium=rss Tue, 3 Nov 2009 12:21:38 UTC 6418270 ms Anonymous [Signature #144] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6418086?utm_medium=rss Tue, 3 Nov 2009 11:47:48 UTC 6418086 Ms Christine Groothues [Signature #143] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6417970?utm_medium=rss This proposed development seems totally inappropriate for the area and will result in the loss of existing business units. It will not create any jobs for local people.

]]> Tue, 3 Nov 2009 11:21:21 UTC 6417970 Mr David Jesudason [Signature #142] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6417726?utm_medium=rss As well as being a hideous structure, this another attempt for a large company to draw funds outside of the local area without any reinvestment. The appearance of such multinationals rob the area of its cultural diversity, unique appearance and friendliness. We are never consulted on the installation of new Tesco Metros (which close down beloved local shops) and this is one monstrosity too far.

]]> Tue, 3 Nov 2009 10:16:48 UTC 6417726 Mr Nigel Barnes [Signature #141] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6417550?utm_medium=rss Tue, 3 Nov 2009 09:32:11 UTC 6417550 Anne Rowley [Signature #140] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6417511?utm_medium=rss Building on this site could destroy the livelihood of many small businesses which are facing a difficult enough time at present, without the added stress of wondering if they will soon be without premises.

]]> Tue, 3 Nov 2009 09:22:41 UTC 6417511 Ms Sheila Harvey [Signature #139] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6417347?utm_medium=rss I agree that it is important to maintain diversity and vigour of local businesses, supplyng services and employment for local people and safeguading the visual appeal of buildings of mixed ae style and use.

]]> Tue, 3 Nov 2009 08:40:14 UTC 6417347 Mrs Vivienne Todd [Signature #138] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6417337?utm_medium=rss Another job for the boys!

]]> Tue, 3 Nov 2009 08:38:58 UTC 6417337 Miss Fiona Kinnear [Signature #137] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6416918?utm_medium=rss Tue, 3 Nov 2009 07:09:02 UTC 6416918 miss dudu hasan [Signature #136] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6414390?utm_medium=rss Mon, 2 Nov 2009 02:14:08 UTC 6414390 miss kate mcfarlane [Signature #135] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6414110?utm_medium=rss Mon, 2 Nov 2009 12:52:28 UTC 6414110 ms chris tracey [Signature #134] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6413384?utm_medium=rss Mon, 2 Nov 2009 09:36:48 UTC 6413384 Ms Alice Dee [Signature #133] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6413151?utm_medium=rss Mon, 2 Nov 2009 08:37:39 UTC 6413151 mr John Lewis [Signature #132] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6413089?utm_medium=rss Some parts of Lewisham are ugly enough without this monstrosity

]]> Mon, 2 Nov 2009 08:19:42 UTC 6413089 Bronwyn Sutton [Signature #131] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6412813?utm_medium=rss Mon, 2 Nov 2009 06:45:59 UTC 6412813 Mr Michael Delaney [Signature #130] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6412248?utm_medium=rss Mon, 2 Nov 2009 03:12:30 UTC 6412248 Ms Kimberley Barton [Signature #129] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6410667?utm_medium=rss I say no to the planning permission and I wish better for the surrounding area with the possibility of regeneration to the existing buildings, rather than another unnecessary storage facility.

]]> Sun, 1 Nov 2009 04:17:22 UTC 6410667 Mr Davide Minuti [Signature #128] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6410648?utm_medium=rss I object strongly to the building of a large cumbersome structure and unnecessary business in such a fragile area....

]]> Sun, 1 Nov 2009 04:09:25 UTC 6410648 Mr Jonathan Leiper [Signature #127] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6409869?utm_medium=rss Sun, 1 Nov 2009 11:41:14 UTC 6409869 Mr James Vallance [Signature #126] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6409866?utm_medium=rss Sun, 1 Nov 2009 11:40:37 UTC 6409866 Ms Andrea Leiper [Signature #125] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6409860?utm_medium=rss Sun, 1 Nov 2009 11:39:55 UTC 6409860 ms Nancy Secchi [Signature #124] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6409753?utm_medium=rss Don't mind the business but not the building, very poor taste and although I would welcome replacing the existing buildings the design could be much better, lets not lose the opportunity to IMPROVE what is there. Let's have aspirations for the area!

]]> Sun, 1 Nov 2009 11:06:12 UTC 6409753 Amanda Forrester [Signature #123] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6409541?utm_medium=rss Sun, 1 Nov 2009 09:53:55 UTC 6409541 Miss brigitte deneck [Signature #122] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6409459?utm_medium=rss Sun, 1 Nov 2009 09:24:45 UTC 6409459 Mr Paul Lucas [Signature #121] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6408979?utm_medium=rss Lewisham Way is surrounded by residential areas made up of victorian housing many of which fall within conservation areas. This proposal does nothing to add or improve the area and goes completely against the look and feel of the area. We do not need or want such a hideous blot on our landscape.

]]> Sun, 1 Nov 2009 06:06:10 UTC 6408979 Miss Anonymous [Signature #120] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6408123?utm_medium=rss Lewisham Way is a completely inappropriate site for a self storage facility. Lewisham Way has the potential to be a lovely thoroughfare. If this were to go ahead, it would completely eradicate that potential. Say no!

]]> Sat, 31 Oct 2009 08:45:47 UTC 6408123 Mr Tim Chaplin [Signature #119] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6407467?utm_medium=rss This site is not suitable for a large storage facility. It would be out of place in the existing row of shops and would create more traffic. There are plenty of other storage facilities in the same area.

]]> Sat, 31 Oct 2009 03:18:05 UTC 6407467 Mrs Catherine Jones [Signature #118] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6407380?utm_medium=rss Sat, 31 Oct 2009 02:43:05 UTC 6407380 Mrs Louise Varley [Signature #117] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6404428?utm_medium=rss Fri, 30 Oct 2009 04:28:51 UTC 6404428 Miss Naomi watson [Signature #116] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6403150?utm_medium=rss It is outrageous that this could be planned so close to the conservation area. This is a esidential area nt a main road.

]]> Fri, 30 Oct 2009 10:23:21 UTC 6403150 Ms Celia O'Brien [Signature #115] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6402175?utm_medium=rss Please do not allow this dreadful monstrosity to go ahead. It's the last thing the area needs.

]]> Fri, 30 Oct 2009 05:25:58 UTC 6402175 Ms Diane Berry [Signature #114] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6400361?utm_medium=rss Thu, 29 Oct 2009 06:52:01 UTC 6400361 Mr Chye Peck [Signature #113] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6400052?utm_medium=rss It will destroy the value of the Art House right opposite it. The building will not blend well with the surrounding architecture and will hider the potential of the area becoming a lovely high street.

]]> Thu, 29 Oct 2009 05:34:49 UTC 6400052 Miss Sarah Hainsworth [Signature #112] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6399309?utm_medium=rss Thu, 29 Oct 2009 02:49:38 UTC 6399309 Mrs Gill Park [Signature #111] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6398980?utm_medium=rss Thu, 29 Oct 2009 01:29:40 UTC 6398980 Mr Andrew Dehany [Signature #110] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6398484?utm_medium=rss Thu, 29 Oct 2009 11:48:38 UTC 6398484 Mr Dave Howell [Signature #109] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6398205?utm_medium=rss Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:49:32 UTC 6398205 John Edwards [Signature #108] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6397897?utm_medium=rss Thu, 29 Oct 2009 09:36:37 UTC 6397897 Mr Townly Cooke [Signature #107] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6397796?utm_medium=rss Thu, 29 Oct 2009 09:09:10 UTC 6397796 Bas Trouw [Signature #106] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6397609?utm_medium=rss The design of the building is extremely unsympathetic with regards to its neighbouring building. As the neighbouring flat (110 Lewisham Way) has a 1920 warehouse facade and the building across the road is a listed building with a library history. The size, colour and design of the building just seem to be way off.

]]> Thu, 29 Oct 2009 08:22:20 UTC 6397609 Lisa Murch [Signature #105] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6397422?utm_medium=rss Thu, 29 Oct 2009 07:44:38 UTC 6397422 Mr Anonymous [Signature #104] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6397347?utm_medium=rss Thu, 29 Oct 2009 07:24:21 UTC 6397347 Ms Anonymous [Signature #103] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6397340?utm_medium=rss Thu, 29 Oct 2009 07:22:29 UTC 6397340 Mr Chris Getliffe [Signature #102] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6397089?utm_medium=rss Thu, 29 Oct 2009 06:28:24 UTC 6397089 mark fraser [Signature #101] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6397008?utm_medium=rss Thu, 29 Oct 2009 06:14:27 UTC 6397008 Laura Harding [Signature #100] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6396837?utm_medium=rss Thu, 29 Oct 2009 05:44:38 UTC 6396837 Mrs Kate Harland [Signature #99] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6396562?utm_medium=rss It is over development, will destroy the character of the parade of small shops on Lewisham Way and will cause problems with parking and traffic noise and nusiance. There is no-where for people to park and there will be congestion and increased traffic.

]]> Thu, 29 Oct 2009 04:57:24 UTC 6396562 Ms Zoe Whitley [Signature #98] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6396238?utm_medium=rss The storage company will do nothing to improve the area but will be unsightly and unnecessary. Thank you.

]]> Thu, 29 Oct 2009 03:30:09 UTC 6396238 Mr Conall Watson [Signature #97] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6396235?utm_medium=rss Shame on Big Yellow. I live next door to the proposed site, and think this will spoil the character of Lewisham Way (opposite the listed ArtHouse, next to the listed Payne's Dept Store, within sight of the Deptford War Memorial). And by destroying the existing light industrial units, Big Yellow will undermine the growing creative industries and start-up businesses that make New Cross / Deptford one of the most interesting and promising areas of Lewisham. No to Big Yellow.

]]> Thu, 29 Oct 2009 03:28:10 UTC 6396235 Mr Liam Westaway [Signature #96] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6393031?utm_medium=rss Wed, 28 Oct 2009 10:53:55 UTC 6393031 Lauren Higgs [Signature #95] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6392599?utm_medium=rss Wed, 28 Oct 2009 09:04:21 UTC 6392599 Miss Miranda Iossifidis [Signature #94] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6392541?utm_medium=rss Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:47:39 UTC 6392541 Miss Rachel Bullivant [Signature #93] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6392043?utm_medium=rss Wed, 28 Oct 2009 06:45:24 UTC 6392043 Jane Heywood [Signature #92] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6391364?utm_medium=rss Wed, 28 Oct 2009 04:16:41 UTC 6391364 Mr John Stevens [Signature #91] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6390184?utm_medium=rss Tue, 27 Oct 2009 07:17:49 UTC 6390184 Mr Thomas Juneau [Signature #90] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6389842?utm_medium=rss Tue, 27 Oct 2009 05:47:45 UTC 6389842 gillian Heywood MBE [Signature #89] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6389763?utm_medium=rss Tue, 27 Oct 2009 05:29:08 UTC 6389763 MR Timothy Webb [Signature #88] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/6389354?utm_medium=rss I object to this development, as I think it is ugly, and will blight the street, as well as being unsympathetic to other architecture in the area.

]]> Tue, 27 Oct 2009 04:01:30 UTC 6389354