Say NO to Jacksons Edge Road Closure Petition: Signature List Feed

dawn cooper [Signature #137]

Fri, 18 Apr 2014 06:18:33 UTC

dawn cooper

why are united utilities not using either of the other 2 available sites, nearer to the reservoir, which will have less impact on the green area and road traffic and residents access , and the local environment ?

Ms Anonymous [Signature #136]

Thu, 4 Apr 2013 09:31:37 UTC

Anonymous

Jonathan Emmerson [Signature #135]

Wed, 27 Mar 2013 12:51:31 UTC

Jonathan Emmerson

I agree with the work to be carried out. However we see this bad traffic management all the time during road works. We, the signers of the petition, know that if the road closures are allowed to go ahead tjen Disley will once again become a constant traffic jam as it has with other road works.

mr Lee Ulyat [Signature #134]

Tue, 26 Mar 2013 05:36:53 UTC

mr Lee Ulyat, Disley, Cheshire

Mr David Bethell [Signature #133]

Sat, 16 Mar 2013 02:55:05 UTC

Mr David Bethell, High Lane, Stockport

Miss Jennifer Smith [Signature #132]

Sun, 3 Mar 2013 02:30:06 UTC

Miss Jennifer Smith

Mrs Alison Avery [Signature #131]

Sun, 24 Feb 2013 12:42:36 UTC

Mrs Alison Avery, Disley, Cheshire

Mr Peter Avery [Signature #130]

Sun, 24 Feb 2013 12:41:51 UTC

Mr Peter Avery, Disley, Cheshire

Mrs Anonymous [Signature #129]

Tue, 19 Feb 2013 03:39:13 UTC

Anonymous, Disley

Mrs Jean Daffy [Signature #128]

Mon, 18 Feb 2013 09:18:43 UTC

Mrs Jean Daffy, Disley, Cheshire

Mr Chris Daffy [Signature #127]

Mon, 18 Feb 2013 08:55:49 UTC

Mr Chris Daffy, Disley, Cheshire

This should ber done in the way that causes least inconvenience to local residents.

Mr Anonymous [Signature #126]

Fri, 15 Feb 2013 07:58:41 UTC

Anonymous, Disley

The use of the quarry for the rubble should be the obvious solution especially as direct access from the reservoir site to the quarry would avoid any construction traffic on Jacksons Edge Road. On NO account should Jacksons Edge Road be closed for any length of time as it provides essential access to village roads & facilities.

Mike Barnes [Signature #125]

Fri, 15 Feb 2013 07:58:22 UTC

Mike Barnes, Stockport

Mr Albert Smith [Signature #124]

Mon, 11 Feb 2013 05:44:58 UTC

Mr Albert Smith, High Lane, Stockport

The Quarry is on the same side of Jacksons Edge Road as the reservoir and there is even an existing gate into the Quarry! Its got to be cheaper for them to use the Quarry! The closure of Jacksons Edge Road is therefore not necessary unless of course United Utilities enjoy annoying and causing inconvenience to local residents!

Dr Steven Naylor [Signature #123]

Sun, 10 Feb 2013 01:13:58 UTC

Dr Steven Naylor

Mr Andy Chapman [Signature #122]

Sat, 9 Feb 2013 03:06:44 UTC

Mr Andy Chapman, DIsley, Cheshire

Mrs Anonymous [Signature #121]

Sat, 9 Feb 2013 08:31:45 UTC

Anonymous

mr Anonymous [Signature #120]

Sat, 9 Feb 2013 08:05:06 UTC

Anonymous

Total A6 standstill with new A6 route

Mrs Susan Hatton [Signature #119]

Fri, 8 Feb 2013 08:09:48 UTC

Mrs Susan Hatton, High lane

Mr Philip Hatton [Signature #118]

Fri, 8 Feb 2013 08:08:01 UTC

Mr Philip Hatton, High lane

Mrs Julie Lomas [Signature #117]

Fri, 8 Feb 2013 12:47:55 UTC

Mrs Julie Lomas, Disley, Cheshire

Mr David Lomas [Signature #116]

Fri, 8 Feb 2013 12:42:43 UTC

Mr David Lomas, Disley, Cheshire

MRS Anonymous [Signature #115]

Fri, 8 Feb 2013 11:23:57 UTC

Anonymous

There are more obvious and less disruptive places to use, and this would really cause traffic chaos. It will also ruin a beautiful view and take a long time to return to normal.

MR Alan Peckham [Signature #114]

Thu, 7 Feb 2013 07:11:29 UTC

MR Alan Peckham, Stockport, Cheshire

Whilst it may be more convenient for United Utilities to close the road and dump the earth and rubble onto the field opposite, the impact of shutting the road for prolonged periods has a very great detrimental effect on the residents who reside nearby. Whilst I have no to the work itself, it is obvious that using the Jacksons Edge quarry, adjacent to the site, would be more logical and have less impact on us residents. As the petition explains, with the proposed delays with the A6 to Manchester Airport relief road due to coincide with these repairs, the effect on traffic will be greatly compounded.

Mr Chris Roberts [Signature #113]

Wed, 6 Feb 2013 06:16:58 UTC

Mr Chris Roberts

Mr Steve Gait [Signature #112]

Mon, 4 Feb 2013 12:10:39 UTC

Mr Steve Gait, Stockport, England

The timing of this scheme with the proposed SEMMMS start date will isolate Disley and make traffic movement along the A6 impossible. Please reconsider the closing of Jacksons Edge Rd to alleviate the problems we will face not only in Disley village, but all surrounding areas.
The possibility of a by-pass has been over 30 years in coming [Blue/Green/Yellow route]. DON't make things impassible for us

Mr John Lord [Signature #111]

Mon, 4 Feb 2013 11:32:33 UTC

Mr John Lord

Mrs C Bottomley [Signature #110]

Mon, 4 Feb 2013 05:56:17 UTC

Mrs C Bottomley, Glossop, Derbyshire

Work on Homestead and will hinder my journey to work greatly!!

Miss Anonymous [Signature #109]

Mon, 4 Feb 2013 05:52:27 UTC

Anonymous, Disley, Cheshire

Mrs Miranda Johnson [Signature #108]

Mon, 4 Feb 2013 05:49:35 UTC

Mrs Miranda Johnson, Disley, Cheshire

Sarah Leadbetter [Signature #107]

Mon, 4 Feb 2013 04:32:44 UTC

Sarah Leadbetter, Disley, Cheshire

Mrs Anonymous [Signature #106]

Thu, 31 Jan 2013 11:46:00 UTC

Anonymous, Disley

Sounds like a load of disruption to me but mainly don;t like the idea of 50000 tons of rubble on our doorstep. a full traffic survey is required especially in the light of the new bypass on the A6. We recently moved to Disley having previously lived around here in the 1970s. The A6 was bad enough then and its even worse now. Agree that the reservoir has to be repaired but careful thought needs to be given to residents etc.

Mr Robert Colley [Signature #105]

Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:00:52 UTC

Mr Robert Colley, Disley, Cheshire

Thu, 31 Jan 2013 05:31:59 UTC

Mr & Mrs Peter Hewer, Disley

Mr Paul Smallwood [Signature #103]

Thu, 31 Jan 2013 03:33:36 UTC

Mr Paul Smallwood, Disley

Mr Dean Garnett [Signature #102]

Tue, 29 Jan 2013 08:03:11 UTC

Mr Dean Garnett

I wont be able to get to work easily

Mr Eugene Briody [Signature #101]

Tue, 29 Jan 2013 08:01:06 UTC

Mr Eugene Briody

It will take me ages to get to work

Mr Anonymous [Signature #100]

Tue, 29 Jan 2013 07:59:04 UTC

Anonymous

Mrs Anonymous [Signature #99]

Tue, 29 Jan 2013 07:43:35 UTC

Anonymous

I agree with the traffic implications for our business. Please fill the quarry up.

Mr Robert Sheils [Signature #98]

Tue, 29 Jan 2013 04:10:18 UTC

Mr Robert Sheils, High lane

Mr Brian Dawson [Signature #97]

Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:36:52 UTC

Mr Brian Dawson, Disley

Brian Turnbull [Signature #96]

Mon, 28 Jan 2013 02:28:52 UTC

Brian Turnbull, Disley

Hilary Turnbull [Signature #95]

Mon, 28 Jan 2013 02:25:00 UTC

Hilary Turnbull, Disley

Mr Mark Turnbull [Signature #94]

Sun, 27 Jan 2013 03:28:23 UTC

Mr Mark Turnbull, Stockport, Cheshire

Barring the Quarry being declared an SSSI it seems ludicrous not to take advantage of such an ideal area for landfill. A short temporary track could be created directly from the reservoir site to the edge of the quarry. Thus removing any requirement for large earth moving equipment to go anywhere near Jacksons Edge Road.

Mrs Gaynor Calvert [Signature #93]

Sun, 27 Jan 2013 11:32:47 UTC

Mrs Gaynor Calvert

The quarry should be the first option to use to take landfill

Mr David Calvert [Signature #92]

Sun, 27 Jan 2013 11:28:44 UTC

Mr David Calvert

Dr Anonymous [Signature #91]

Sun, 27 Jan 2013 05:00:14 UTC

Anonymous

Mrs Lynda Heathcote [Signature #90]

Sat, 26 Jan 2013 11:54:16 UTC

Mrs Lynda Heathcote, High Lane

Mr David Heathcote [Signature #89]

Sat, 26 Jan 2013 11:49:56 UTC

Mr David Heathcote, High Lane, Stockport

Mr Peter Cole [Signature #88]

Sat, 26 Jan 2013 03:05:58 UTC

Mr Peter Cole, Disley

mrs christine macfarland [Signature #87]

Fri, 25 Jan 2013 02:44:50 UTC

mrs christine macfarland

Miss Katie SHARPLES [Signature #86]

Fri, 25 Jan 2013 02:05:19 UTC

Miss Katie SHARPLES, Disley

Mr Stephen Flegg [Signature #85]

Fri, 25 Jan 2013 11:54:07 UTC

Mr Stephen Flegg, Disley

The use of the quarry seems an obvious application of common sense.

Mrs Carol Brady [Signature #84]

Fri, 25 Jan 2013 10:25:08 UTC

Mrs Carol Brady

Mr Philip Brady [Signature #83]

Fri, 25 Jan 2013 10:19:25 UTC

Mr Philip Brady

Mrs Andrea Chadwick [Signature #82]

Fri, 25 Jan 2013 08:06:16 UTC

Mrs Andrea Chadwick, Disley, Cheshire

This work has to be done. However, I see no reason why UU can not use the fields and quarry for the rubble and earth that will be removed. At the end of the three years any excess debris can then be removed.

Mr Robert Grant [Signature #81]

Fri, 25 Jan 2013 07:57:00 UTC

Mr Robert Grant

Will cause absolute chaos in a morning.

Mr Bill SHARPLES [Signature #80]

Fri, 25 Jan 2013 06:25:38 UTC

Mr Bill SHARPLES, Disley

Mr & Mrs Peter & Glenda Davies [Signature #79]

Fri, 25 Jan 2013 05:30:04 UTC

Mr & Mrs Peter & Glenda Davies, Disley, Cheshire

We live in Park Road, which together with Jacksons Edge Rd have both long since become the unacceptable A6 By-Pass, and any further pressure on the A6 by any planned closure of Jacksons Edge Rd will result in further increased 'rat-run' traffic on Park Road, which for the residents, will be intollerable. East Cheshire Council need to wake up! Have they any idea what they have done to Poynton!!!!

Mrs Joyce Ainsbury [Signature #78]

Fri, 25 Jan 2013 05:03:55 UTC

Mrs Joyce Ainsbury, Disley

mrs moyra ivory [Signature #77]

Thu, 24 Jan 2013 03:46:48 UTC

mrs moyra ivory, disley

mr philip ivory [Signature #76]

Thu, 24 Jan 2013 03:45:56 UTC

mr philip ivory, disley

mr philip travis [Signature #75]

Thu, 24 Jan 2013 03:44:23 UTC

mr philip travis, disley

mr sarah travis [Signature #74]

Thu, 24 Jan 2013 03:42:06 UTC

mr sarah travis

Mr Richard Stanton [Signature #73]

Thu, 24 Jan 2013 01:26:08 UTC

Mr Richard Stanton, Disley

William Miller [Signature #72]

Thu, 24 Jan 2013 09:46:20 UTC

William Miller, Disley

Kathleen Miller [Signature #71]

Thu, 24 Jan 2013 09:38:43 UTC

Kathleen Miller, DisleySQ

Mr david talbot [Signature #70]

Thu, 24 Jan 2013 06:43:46 UTC

Mr david talbot

I have asked on two occasions why the quarry could not be used as it seemed the obvious choice. The first reply was because of Badgers. (This seemed frivolous, as the Government were planning a Badger cull. Not a prtected species.) The second was because of non native plants, so the spoil could not be removed. Again this can be managed. I don't know the actual reason why the quarry can't be used?

Mr PHILIP GOSLING [Signature #69]

Wed, 23 Jan 2013 03:52:08 UTC

Mr PHILIP GOSLING

Minimum disruption to residents is more important than a slight increase in costs, if such costs are even incurred.

Diane Rothwell [Signature #68]

Wed, 23 Jan 2013 03:36:04 UTC

Diane Rothwell

Anonymous [Signature #67]

Wed, 23 Jan 2013 12:29:45 UTC

Anonymous

Ms Eileen Shepherd [Signature #66]

Wed, 23 Jan 2013 09:03:58 UTC

Ms Eileen Shepherd

Mr Thomas Jeffrey Walsh [Signature #65]

Wed, 23 Jan 2013 08:29:34 UTC

Mr Thomas Jeffrey Walsh, Disley, Cheshire

Surely this work alongside the other major work on the A6 is going to cause complete chaos on an already busy route

Mrs Carole Rose Walsh [Signature #64]

Wed, 23 Jan 2013 08:26:58 UTC

Mrs Carole Rose Walsh, Disley, Cheshire

This work will be running alongside the start of the new bypass work on the A6 will cause absolutel chaos on an already over-used road by heavy vehicles. Lets see some common sense for a change.

Mr Christopher Baker [Signature #63]

Wed, 23 Jan 2013 07:39:21 UTC

Mr Christopher Baker, Disley, Stockport

Of course they should use the quarry to store excavated material. The disruption to Jackson's Edge Road arising from using the proposed location would be a disaster both for nearby residents and for road users in general.

mr mike leech [Signature #62]

Wed, 23 Jan 2013 06:52:46 UTC

mr mike leech, disley stockport, cheshire

crazy not to use the quarry for tipping. would only need to divert a footpath instead of causing major traffic disruption on jacksons edge and surrounding roads.

mr David Rigby [Signature #61]

Wed, 23 Jan 2013 06:26:39 UTC

mr David Rigby, Disley

mr Keith Hyde [Signature #60]

Wed, 23 Jan 2013 06:06:01 UTC

mr Keith Hyde

mr Ken Ibbotson [Signature #59]

Wed, 23 Jan 2013 06:04:39 UTC

mr Ken Ibbotson

mr barry ainsbury [Signature #58]

Wed, 23 Jan 2013 06:03:01 UTC

mr barry ainsbury

Mr John Thompson [Signature #57]

Wed, 23 Jan 2013 05:00:56 UTC

Mr John Thompson

Mr Andrew Wright [Signature #56]

Wed, 23 Jan 2013 03:51:19 UTC

Mr Andrew Wright, Disley

I would strongly urge that a process of minimum disruption should be followed and support the plan to utilise the quarry.

mrs betty davies [Signature #55]

Wed, 23 Jan 2013 03:43:23 UTC

mrs betty davies

mr john davies [Signature #54]

Wed, 23 Jan 2013 01:05:08 UTC

mr john davies, disley

Mr Dennis Parker [Signature #53]

Wed, 23 Jan 2013 12:17:54 UTC

Mr Dennis Parker

The quarry should be used to minimise road closure and keep heavy wagons off the road. Also they should leave a new pathway/cycleway through the quarry once they finish to remove the pedestrian/cycle hazard on Jackson's Edge road.

Ms Traci Blatchford [Signature #52]

Tue, 22 Jan 2013 11:41:40 UTC

Ms Traci Blatchford

Say NO to Jacksons Edge Road Closure and support a move to get the works into the quarry and out of the field off Jackson Edge Road and Light Alders Lane.

Ms Susan Adams [Signature #51]

Tue, 22 Jan 2013 04:21:51 UTC

Ms Susan Adams, Disley

It is unacceptable that UU have failed to provide information about the planning application to all local residents. From the information provided the quarry would appear to be the best option. There now needs to be honest and open discussion to decide the best way forward.

Mrs Jean Bridge [Signature #50]

Tue, 22 Jan 2013 02:13:21 UTC

Mrs Jean Bridge

Mr Paul Bridge [Signature #49]

Tue, 22 Jan 2013 02:12:24 UTC

Mr Paul Bridge

Mr Andrew Smith [Signature #48]

Tue, 22 Jan 2013 01:58:11 UTC

Mr Andrew Smith, Disley

Mrs Anonymous [Signature #47]

Tue, 22 Jan 2013 01:30:57 UTC

Anonymous

Please do not add to traffic congestion in this area by closing Jacksons Edge Rd.

Mr and Mrs David and Jan Artingstall [Signature #46]

Tue, 22 Jan 2013 01:03:37 UTC

Mr and Mrs David and Jan Artingstall, Disley

We are very much in support of using the quarry for disposal of waste material from the reservoir repair and can't understand why this alternative doesn't seem to have been properly explored

Mrs Jill Jacobs [Signature #45]

Tue, 22 Jan 2013 11:09:20 UTC

Mrs Jill Jacobs

Mr Anthony Jacobs [Signature #44]

Tue, 22 Jan 2013 11:07:57 UTC

Mr Anthony Jacobs

Mrs Joy Forrest [Signature #43]

Tue, 22 Jan 2013 08:13:01 UTC

Mrs Joy Forrest

Mr Alexander Wood [Signature #42]

Tue, 22 Jan 2013 07:30:42 UTC

Mr Alexander Wood, Disley, Cheshire

This would make life geting home from work in an already hectic A6 rush hour all the more frustrating. Not to mention the plans to work on the bypass simultaneously. Ludicrous plans!

MRS STEPHEN WOOD [Signature #41]

Tue, 22 Jan 2013 07:15:32 UTC

MRS STEPHEN WOOD, DISLEY, CHESHIRE

Please use the disused quarry to dump earth, minimising disruption for local residents. The A6 is already difficult on a daily basis. When there is an accident the village comes to a standstill; with Jackson's Edge closures there would be no alternative route.

Mr Ben Tutton [Signature #40]

Tue, 22 Jan 2013 07:14:55 UTC

Mr Ben Tutton, Macclesfield, Cheshire

Mrs Lauren Tutton [Signature #39]

Tue, 22 Jan 2013 07:13:34 UTC

Mrs Lauren Tutton, Macclesfield, Cheshire

MRS GAENOR WOOD [Signature #38]

Tue, 22 Jan 2013 07:10:27 UTC

MRS GAENOR WOOD, DISLEY, CHESHIRE

Please consider using the disused quarry to dump earth, minimising disruption for local residents.