Say No to the London Road Development Petition: Signature List Feed http://www.gopetition.com/signatures/say-no-to-the-london-road-development.html Online petition signatures en-us Sat, 11 Apr 2026 01:52 UTC GoPetition RSS Feed Generator Copyright 2026 GoPetition mrs jenny sturtivant [Signature #398] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10962343?utm_medium=rss NO CONSIDERATION BY AVDC ON THE CAHOS TO TRAFIIC AND INABILITY NOF CUREENT RESIDENTS TO USE ROADS WHICH WILL BE CONTINUALLY IN A JAM WITH MORE THAN 700 MORE CARS POSSIBLEY UP 1400 TRYING TO GO TO WORK AND SCHOOL EACH DAY NO NEW SWIMMING OR FACILLITIES AND DESTRUCTION OF COUNTRYSIDE WILD LIFE NO NEW HOSPITAL FACILLIES
A DISGRACE TO ALLOW THIS TO HAPPEN NO REAL THOUGHT TO ALREADY DAMAGED RO HEAVY TRAFFIC ROADS NO THOUGHT FOR SILVERSTONE WEEKENDS OR ANY ONE WHO LIVES HERE OR KEEPS YOU IN YOUR JOB

]]> Sun, 7 Aug 2011 11:06:43 UTC 10962343 Mrs Janice Scarr [Signature #397] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/5518380?utm_medium=rss Thu, 21 May 2009 03:30:04 UTC 5518380 Christopher Day [Signature #396] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4686247?utm_medium=rss Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:54:55 UTC 4686247 MR Matthew Watkins [Signature #395] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4683239?utm_medium=rss Wed, 17 Dec 2008 03:27:25 UTC 4683239 Mr Tom Still [Signature #394] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4546113?utm_medium=rss Mon, 1 Dec 2008 09:32:29 UTC 4546113 Mr Ben Ogden [Signature #393] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4514256?utm_medium=rss Fri, 21 Nov 2008 06:44:16 UTC 4514256 Miss Madeleine Horne [Signature #392] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4487810?utm_medium=rss It would ruin Buckingham, it is supposed to be a bypass; therefore bypassing the town, not a pass through!

]]> Sat, 15 Nov 2008 10:15:32 UTC 4487810 Mr and Mrs P Campbell [Signature #391] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4417308?utm_medium=rss Sat, 1 Nov 2008 11:59:52 UTC 4417308 mr terry cavender [Signature #390] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4405927?utm_medium=rss Given the recent response by the environment agency to NOT address flooding in buckingham, no further development should be allowed until full details of how surface water runoff will be addressed without impacting Buckingham and the ouse valley inclduign full hydrodynamic modelling.

]]> Fri, 31 Oct 2008 05:40:23 UTC 4405927 Beverley Gray [Signature #389] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4404671?utm_medium=rss An estate on the outer side of the ringroad will be the gateway to further expansion and will ruin the character of Buckingham as a country market town. In addition schools and roads in Buckingham are already overcrowded.

]]> Fri, 31 Oct 2008 03:43:03 UTC 4404671 Simon Hooper [Signature #388] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4396778?utm_medium=rss I think the claim that such a development would have minimal traffic impact is totally absurd. There is more than enough traffic congestion in the town and on the A421 already. Furthermore, the town is unable to support the significant increase in population that would result.

]]> Thu, 30 Oct 2008 11:09:11 UTC 4396778 Mr Antony Catling [Signature #387] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4392007?utm_medium=rss Utterly ridiculous to add a large estate of houses to an already congested town. This will result in more noise, more congestion, more pollution, the need to widen roads and will turn this pleasant town into a chaotic mess.

]]> Thu, 30 Oct 2008 03:43:49 UTC 4392007 Mrs Rachel Craig [Signature #386] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4381484?utm_medium=rss This development is too intensive and not sympathetic to the needs of the buckingham community. It adds nothing to the community and detracts in terms of congestion and additional strain on community services.

]]> Wed, 29 Oct 2008 04:27:33 UTC 4381484 MR MARK PEABODY [Signature #385] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4375302?utm_medium=rss NO MORE HOUSING DEVELOPMENTS IN BUCKINGHAM, THERE IS ALREADY TOO MANY!!!!

]]> Tue, 28 Oct 2008 08:02:16 UTC 4375302 MRS NICOLA MARSH [Signature #384] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4375289?utm_medium=rss THERE IS TOO MUCH BUILDING IN BUCKINGHAM TO SUSTAIN THE AMENITIES AND FACILITIES OF THE TOWN, MY MAIN CONCERN WOULD BE THE SCHOOLING FACILITIES AT HIGH SCHOOL STAGE WITH THE EXTRA PUPILS THE SCHOOL WOUULD NOT BE ABLE TO COPE WITH SUCH AN EXTRA DRAW ON ITS RESOURCES!!

]]> Tue, 28 Oct 2008 07:59:49 UTC 4375289 A Wilkins [Signature #383] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4371978?utm_medium=rss Mon, 27 Oct 2008 04:10:05 UTC 4371978 Mr David Loasby [Signature #382] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4371945?utm_medium=rss We need to ensure that we have the road infrastructure to cope with the traffic we have at present, before we add to the current peak time congestion.

]]> Mon, 27 Oct 2008 04:01:09 UTC 4371945 Mr Tony Wilson [Signature #381] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4371924?utm_medium=rss I object to this unnecessary over development based on lack of infrastructure, flood risk, loss of small town status, town parking and increased traffic noise, co2 and congestion. The latter item alone has already been identified as a major problem in the BCC LTP2 supporting document, where it states the development will exacerbate London Road/A421 junction capacity issues to beyond 2016, particularly as funding for the A421 bypass dualling is unlikely to be available in the short term. Say NO!

]]> Mon, 27 Oct 2008 03:54:42 UTC 4371924 Mrs Zoe Loasby [Signature #380] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4371668?utm_medium=rss Quantity of housing and situation of the proposed development is inappropriate for the outskirts of a modest country market town. I have lived in other areas of similar size where such developments have overwhelmed already overstretched medical and secondary schooling facilities when significant additional investment isn't provided. Buckingham doesn't have the infrastructure to cope with this expansion, and lack of investment in 'other' facilities will leave teenagers bored and roaming streets.

]]> Mon, 27 Oct 2008 02:38:01 UTC 4371668 Mrs Sally Wilson [Signature #379] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4371581?utm_medium=rss Mon, 27 Oct 2008 02:17:36 UTC 4371581 Mr Michael Lee [Signature #378] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4371256?utm_medium=rss Mon, 27 Oct 2008 12:47:04 UTC 4371256 Mrs Irene Lee [Signature #377] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4371251?utm_medium=rss Mon, 27 Oct 2008 12:44:31 UTC 4371251 Mrs Mandy Forbes [Signature #376] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4371116?utm_medium=rss Mon, 27 Oct 2008 12:06:59 UTC 4371116 Mr Daniel O'Donoghue [Signature #375] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4370395?utm_medium=rss Why hasn't this proposal been publicised more to allow proper feedback from those it will affect?

People in Buckingham have seen more and more houses built, affecting the local services. Yet there are no plans for more health centres, leisure facilities or educational establishments to be built - why not? and how can AVDC allow homes to be built without the infrastructure changing to cope with the amount of people moving into the area?

]]> Mon, 27 Oct 2008 08:32:47 UTC 4370395 Mrs Lisa O'Donoghue [Signature #374] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4370367?utm_medium=rss I would like to know if the Council has asked the local health services - the doctors surgeries, dentists etc, how another 700 houses with approx 4 people per household, will affect them?

Having lived in the area for 5 years we have noticed a considerable increase on the roads both around and through Buckingham, during the rush hour.

Our local primary school has increased its intake causing chaos for the people living nearby. Another 700 homes will need more than 1 new school to be built!

]]> Mon, 27 Oct 2008 08:23:18 UTC 4370367 Dr S Sockalingam [Signature #373] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4370094?utm_medium=rss I recognise the need for more houses as the population grows but the proposed development would first and foremost need a new suitably placed by-pass. Additional infrastructure to adequately accommodate the increased population would also be needed.

]]> Mon, 27 Oct 2008 07:00:16 UTC 4370094 Mrs Catherine Cooper [Signature #372] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4369730?utm_medium=rss This development is too big and will have a huge impact on the very busy A421 bypass.
The town and facilities aren't big enough to cope with the extra population e.g. parking, roads etc.
What about the senior schools - how will they cope with increased numbers.

]]> Mon, 27 Oct 2008 05:18:54 UTC 4369730 Mr Paul Woodham [Signature #371] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4369696?utm_medium=rss Mon, 27 Oct 2008 05:11:37 UTC 4369696 Mr Michael Smith [Signature #370] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4369480?utm_medium=rss Mon, 27 Oct 2008 04:22:26 UTC 4369480 MR Anonymous [Signature #369] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4369424?utm_medium=rss Keep Buckingham as it is, we don't want it turning into Another Aylesbury.Traffic congestion is already at it's worst since i've been living here for 6 years.

]]> Mon, 27 Oct 2008 04:11:47 UTC 4369424 Vanessa Green [Signature #368] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4369362?utm_medium=rss Mon, 27 Oct 2008 03:51:35 UTC 4369362 Mrs Jill Williams [Signature #367] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4369346?utm_medium=rss Mon, 27 Oct 2008 03:43:35 UTC 4369346 Mrs Debbie King [Signature #366] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4367258?utm_medium=rss Please don't allow this development. It will spoil the local area.

]]> Sun, 26 Oct 2008 01:24:06 UTC 4367258 mrs Diane hunt [Signature #365] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4367223?utm_medium=rss Sun, 26 Oct 2008 01:10:55 UTC 4367223 mr michael hunt [Signature #364] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4367211?utm_medium=rss aa poor location for this development,traffic already congested not enough infrastucture,and most important the loss of wildlife habitats which supports bird species which are in serious decline ie skylark

]]> Sun, 26 Oct 2008 01:07:24 UTC 4367211 Mrs Francine MacDonald [Signature #363] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4367198?utm_medium=rss There are more than enough houses being built or already built in this region. It affects the amount of traffic considerably which is increasing year upon year, and makes living in this area something to be avoided. In fact, we are considering moving to a quieter part of the country to live! Buckinghamshire used to be a beautiful county to live in and it is slowly being swamped by houses and empty industrial units! It is time there was a stop to all of this!

]]> Sun, 26 Oct 2008 01:04:42 UTC 4367198 Mrs Andrea Robinson [Signature #362] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4365951?utm_medium=rss Sun, 26 Oct 2008 05:42:08 UTC 4365951 Elizabeth Kemp [Signature #361] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4365937?utm_medium=rss Sun, 26 Oct 2008 05:32:56 UTC 4365937 Mr Martin Wells [Signature #360] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4364966?utm_medium=rss The style of housing and density of the proposed development are totally inappropriate for the outskirts of a modest country market town. The resulting increase in the town's population will overwhelm Buckingham's services, especially the already overstretched medical facilities unless significant additional investment is provided. Buckingham simply does not have the infrastructure to cope with an expansion of this size.

]]> Sat, 25 Oct 2008 06:24:34 UTC 4364966 Mrs Deb Mabbutt [Signature #359] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4363643?utm_medium=rss Buckingham is big enough. We do not have enough parking & shops for the current population. The senior schools are also overcrowded, another junior school would only make this worse. The ring road is atrocious in the morning and from about 4 onwards. Please leave Buckinghams population as it is.

]]> Sat, 25 Oct 2008 09:11:42 UTC 4363643 ALAN WILLIAMS [Signature #358] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4363296?utm_medium=rss Sat, 25 Oct 2008 06:40:23 UTC 4363296 mrs margaret riley [Signature #357] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4363149?utm_medium=rss Sat, 25 Oct 2008 05:26:27 UTC 4363149 Jack and Barbara Charge [Signature #356] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4363143?utm_medium=rss Sat, 25 Oct 2008 05:23:38 UTC 4363143 Mrs Kitty Bain [Signature #355] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4363080?utm_medium=rss Not a good idea. Town is a nightmare to get round now in our mobility scooters.

]]> Sat, 25 Oct 2008 04:58:14 UTC 4363080 Miss Deborah Marsh [Signature #354] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4361428?utm_medium=rss Fri, 24 Oct 2008 02:30:07 UTC 4361428 Mrs Sally Squibb [Signature #353] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4360663?utm_medium=rss This is not designated as developement land. The proposed by-pass was supposed to go through the middle of this land so no decision should be made until route of by-pass is finalised. These proposals do not promote government plans to encourage people to walk and become more active.

]]> Fri, 24 Oct 2008 10:19:49 UTC 4360663 Linda Hardy [Signature #352] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4360289?utm_medium=rss More water run off, less soaking away in open fields means more rain water heading for the river....Oh what a joy for people who almost get flooded now to look forward to.

]]> Fri, 24 Oct 2008 08:25:13 UTC 4360289 mrs Eileen Taylor [Signature #351] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4360263?utm_medium=rss It is all very well saying you will build a new junior school but what happens when the children reach senior school age?

]]> Fri, 24 Oct 2008 08:14:34 UTC 4360263 Mr David Squibb [Signature #350] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4360196?utm_medium=rss Land in question not designated for development in District Local Plan. Sites originally identified remain undeveloped and are better sited. No development should be entertained until future of by-pass decided. Current location of A421 cuts development off from Town. Increase in traffic will generate more noise and congestion. Fails to address sustainable integration issue. Development does not offer employment opportunities.

]]> Fri, 24 Oct 2008 07:56:06 UTC 4360196 Mr David Horne [Signature #349] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4360126?utm_medium=rss Totally opposed to this proposal. Buckingham cannot cope with the current and recent new developments. The character of the town is being changed for the worse!

]]> Fri, 24 Oct 2008 07:33:54 UTC 4360126 Mrs Jennifer Newhook [Signature #348] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4355388?utm_medium=rss As a teacher I think the additional strain that the proposed volume of housing will put on the schools in Buckingham will have a very negative effect, with parents forced to drive their children to schools some distance away.

]]> Thu, 23 Oct 2008 03:22:34 UTC 4355388 Mr Paul Newhook [Signature #347] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4355373?utm_medium=rss I think the proposed development will have a very detrimental impact on what is a rural town. It will cause an already congested area of the town huge traffic issues.

]]> Thu, 23 Oct 2008 03:18:48 UTC 4355373 Lisa Hickman [Signature #346] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4355125?utm_medium=rss Thu, 23 Oct 2008 02:37:17 UTC 4355125 Mrs Valerie Smith [Signature #345] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4354826?utm_medium=rss Thu, 23 Oct 2008 01:54:04 UTC 4354826 Mr & Mrs Ron & Jean Thompson [Signature #344] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4350643?utm_medium=rss I feel the size of the development is inappropriate for a small market town. It is unrealistic to suggest residents would walk to the Town Centre so it would generate a great deal more traffic. It is all well and good to say that a primary school would be included but what will happen when children reach secondary age as the secondary schools in Buckingham are already bursting at the seams. There is also the unquantifiable effect on the wildlife in the area.

]]> Thu, 23 Oct 2008 04:43:44 UTC 4350643 Mr Steve Robinson [Signature #343] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4347679?utm_medium=rss This is a totally impractical Idea. No thought seems to have been made for those who live on the Badgers Estate & surrounding areas.The traffic noise is already to high,so the expansion of the ring road to a duel carrage way will make matter worse! And then what next? the linking of the Tingewick bye pass to the ring road and then onto bottle bank round about? This will only increase the traffic flow from the M40 through to MK & the M1. Quite simply NO! This plan can not be approved.

]]> Wed, 22 Oct 2008 04:54:35 UTC 4347679 Mr David Denyer [Signature #342] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4347594?utm_medium=rss Wed, 22 Oct 2008 04:34:34 UTC 4347594 mr carl hankins [Signature #341] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4347061?utm_medium=rss Wed, 22 Oct 2008 02:30:01 UTC 4347061 mr John Walsh [Signature #340] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4346722?utm_medium=rss Wed, 22 Oct 2008 12:59:05 UTC 4346722 mrs Dorothy Walsh [Signature #339] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4346694?utm_medium=rss Road congestion, parking problems, jobs, school places, town amenities, special needs responsibilities, medical services are all under pressure now. With a massive development like this I can only imagine what the impact will be but it is a sure fact it won't be good.

]]> Wed, 22 Oct 2008 12:47:47 UTC 4346694 Mrs Elizabeth Cooke [Signature #338] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4346167?utm_medium=rss This is NOT a good idea. It is not even a stupid idea, it's a criminally insane idea.

]]> Wed, 22 Oct 2008 10:44:26 UTC 4346167 mr Claude Cooke [Signature #337] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4346113?utm_medium=rss The parking in town has reached melt down already and that is only the tip of the iceburg of problems that would be waiting in the wings if this plan is passed. It is sheer stupidity to even give this plan consideration.

]]> Wed, 22 Oct 2008 10:31:52 UTC 4346113 Mr Stuart Shearman [Signature #336] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4345078?utm_medium=rss Wed, 22 Oct 2008 06:21:40 UTC 4345078 Mr Phillip Wells [Signature #335] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4344852?utm_medium=rss Badgers Estate is murder to get out of as the traffic is horendous NOW, and you want to build another 700 Houses, that will be at least another 1000 cars to join the traffic.

You are taking the Micheal its obvious you dont live here and couldent care less.

]]> Wed, 22 Oct 2008 04:36:33 UTC 4344852 Mrs Janet Matthews [Signature #334] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4344736?utm_medium=rss Too larger development for the small town of Buckingham. This is NOT Milton Keynes

]]> Wed, 22 Oct 2008 03:42:13 UTC 4344736 Mr David Matthews [Signature #333] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4344725?utm_medium=rss Not an appropriate development for the small Market Town of Buckingham. What about brown field sites in Bucks???

]]> Wed, 22 Oct 2008 03:33:13 UTC 4344725 MIss Naomi Harvey [Signature #332] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4343092?utm_medium=rss Tue, 21 Oct 2008 04:40:09 UTC 4343092 Mr Calum Bell [Signature #331] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4343055?utm_medium=rss An overstreatched transport infrastructure cannot cope with another 1000 cars+ each morning and evening. Take one look at the developments opposite Watermead in Aylesbury, the resulting chaos at those feeder junctions and learn! As it stands you cannot get out of the Badgers estate onto the 421 due to traffic flow how on earth will this proposed additional burden manage to get out of the new development?? And as for schools etc where is the capacity??
NO No NO

]]> Tue, 21 Oct 2008 04:25:11 UTC 4343055 Mr Neil Christie [Signature #330] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4342956?utm_medium=rss too much traffic on the A421 ring road, and the A413 already. Mayhem morning and night rush hours. local infrastructure cannot possibly withstand this kind of increase.

]]> Tue, 21 Oct 2008 03:51:33 UTC 4342956 mrs pamela o'hara [Signature #329] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4342642?utm_medium=rss Tue, 21 Oct 2008 02:11:10 UTC 4342642 mr peter ryan [Signature #328] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4342628?utm_medium=rss Tue, 21 Oct 2008 02:06:08 UTC 4342628 Mr Chris Cory [Signature #327] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4342593?utm_medium=rss Tue, 21 Oct 2008 01:52:30 UTC 4342593 mrs kathleen ryan [Signature #326] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4342582?utm_medium=rss Buckingham simply cannot take anymore housing developments. Traffic flow will be halted, it has already been greatly hampered by the extra housing developments along the A421 going towards Bicester. This is already a very busy road with a huge volume of heavy vehicular through traffic. A further minimum of 700 cars will cause chaos and fatalities. A primary school on site is planned, but where will older children go? More cars taking them to and fro.

]]> Tue, 21 Oct 2008 01:47:57 UTC 4342582 Mrs Naomi Beaven [Signature #325] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4342397?utm_medium=rss there are plenty of brown sites around including heyford which havent been developed on yet.

]]> Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:49:55 UTC 4342397 Mr Steven Kefford [Signature #324] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4342039?utm_medium=rss I consider this development totally inappropriate on a number of grounds.

The centre of Buckingham already suffers from congestion, and anything which increases the local population further will only worsen this situation. As an example, the town centre car park is frequently full, and the traffic flow easily breaks down. It is at, or close to capacity.

There is a general lack of amenities in the area, and an increase in population will make this worse.

The existing bypass already has a lar

]]> Tue, 21 Oct 2008 10:57:37 UTC 4342039 Mr & Mrs Ernie & Gill Jones [Signature #323] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4341987?utm_medium=rss How on earth can the developers intimate the residents of Buckingham welcome this development? I attended the exhibition at the Town Hall and the feedback I received was certainly NOT of this opinion.

]]> Tue, 21 Oct 2008 10:44:11 UTC 4341987 Mr Alan Hall [Signature #322] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4341666?utm_medium=rss Tue, 21 Oct 2008 09:17:14 UTC 4341666 Mrs Caroline Goble [Signature #321] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4341594?utm_medium=rss Please do not spoil our lovely small town. Creating more traffic problems & putting even more strain on our local services & facilities. We must not have a dual-carriageway.

]]> Tue, 21 Oct 2008 08:55:49 UTC 4341594 Mr Duncan Goble [Signature #320] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4341567?utm_medium=rss We are very concerned about traffic congestion. We don't want a dual-carriageway.

]]> Tue, 21 Oct 2008 08:49:55 UTC 4341567 Mr Mahmoud Ahmed [Signature #319] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4340884?utm_medium=rss Tue, 21 Oct 2008 04:31:24 UTC 4340884 mr Mark Pallett [Signature #318] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4339565?utm_medium=rss Will someone stop the money grabbers! Buckingham does not need this! at least sort out the waste land in other areas befor concreteing over our fields! MK heading our way? maybe this is a back door for developers to head in the MK direction! some people just want a rural town, there should be a commuter tax! then people like me might have a chance at affording a house in the town they were born in! hopwfully its still a town and not a city by the time i get to that point! call me! 07779634738

]]> Mon, 20 Oct 2008 05:29:21 UTC 4339565 Mr Brynley Taylor [Signature #317] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4338495?utm_medium=rss Buckingham has neither the capability nor the facilities to absorb extra numbers. There are plenty of properties already built which are empty and available for sale and planned or projected developments in the surrounding villages. We don't want or need any more lost green spaces and traffic congestion.

]]> Mon, 20 Oct 2008 12:44:38 UTC 4338495 Mrs Janette Horwood [Signature #316] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4338447?utm_medium=rss Already not enough Doctors, Dentist, NHS, and secondery school spaces. Not enough parking spaces for us who live here and can not carry heavy bags. Do not distroy any more of the old Buckingham.

]]> Mon, 20 Oct 2008 12:30:54 UTC 4338447 M Smith [Signature #315] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4338373?utm_medium=rss Mon, 20 Oct 2008 12:13:56 UTC 4338373 A Fox [Signature #314] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4338369?utm_medium=rss Mon, 20 Oct 2008 12:12:55 UTC 4338369 Mrs Maureen Turner [Signature #313] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4338044?utm_medium=rss Plans already approved for various developments in Buckingham will put significant pressures on the Town's infrastructure. This further planned development is not sustainable.

]]> Mon, 20 Oct 2008 10:55:00 UTC 4338044 Mrs L Howard [Signature #312] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4337529?utm_medium=rss Mon, 20 Oct 2008 08:20:49 UTC 4337529 Judy Feilder [Signature #311] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4337074?utm_medium=rss I object to this planning mainly for reasons of traffic congestion & noise. Also, loss of farmland.

]]> Mon, 20 Oct 2008 05:21:00 UTC 4337074 Mrs Pat Rutherford [Signature #310] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4336992?utm_medium=rss Mon, 20 Oct 2008 04:39:21 UTC 4336992 Mr Ivan Rutherford [Signature #309] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4336988?utm_medium=rss Mon, 20 Oct 2008 04:38:11 UTC 4336988 mr michael hall [Signature #308] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4336677?utm_medium=rss THIS WILL DESTROY THE CHARACTER OF THE AREA AND CAUSE PROBLEMS IN THE MAIN TOWN OF BUCKINGHHAM

]]> Mon, 20 Oct 2008 01:55:08 UTC 4336677 Dr teresa leão [Signature #307] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4336604?utm_medium=rss The people's voice must be heard. They can not accept an urbain planning that will, probably, cause health injury/ damage . It's enough! Let's respect the law! The people must have a safety aaaand good life!! TERESA LEÃO

]]> Mon, 20 Oct 2008 12:46:07 UTC 4336604 Mrs Claire Prince [Signature #306] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4335136?utm_medium=rss Although not totally against the proposal I feel that the number and type of housing proposed is excessive. There would also need to be more community facilities considered in the plans.

]]> Sun, 19 Oct 2008 01:39:52 UTC 4335136 Mr Ernest Douglas [Signature #305] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4334942?utm_medium=rss The increase in traffic noise at the top end of Hare Close would be overpowering and any peace we have now will be gone .The proposed dualing and new round about will bring traffic chaos to an allready overloaded streach of road.High density housing does not work for anyone and where do all the extra cars go.

]]> Sun, 19 Oct 2008 12:22:30 UTC 4334942 Miss Sophie Wilson [Signature #304] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4334797?utm_medium=rss Sun, 19 Oct 2008 11:25:16 UTC 4334797 Mr Ian Wilson [Signature #303] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4334795?utm_medium=rss Don't spoil Buckingham

]]> Sun, 19 Oct 2008 11:24:15 UTC 4334795 Miss Lauren Wilson [Signature #302] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4334763?utm_medium=rss Buckingham is nice, why spoil it?

]]> Sun, 19 Oct 2008 11:11:45 UTC 4334763 Rosemary Wetherall [Signature #301] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4334509?utm_medium=rss There's far too much traffic on the bypass as it is.

]]> Sun, 19 Oct 2008 09:37:48 UTC 4334509 Julie Mercer [Signature #300] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4334188?utm_medium=rss Sun, 19 Oct 2008 07:06:06 UTC 4334188 Darren Jenkinson [Signature #299] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/4333985?utm_medium=rss I think given the fact that the new developments in Buckingham town centres are not even sold, more housing is an absolute disgrace. Theres no thought about the strain on the infrastructure, dentits doctors etc.

]]> Sun, 19 Oct 2008 05:34:07 UTC 4333985