Miss Ella Cotton [Signature #58]</h1> <article> <h1>Miss Ella Cotton [Signature #58]</h1> <p>Sun, 2 Mar 2014 11:27:36 UTC</p> Miss Ella Cotton, poole, dorset, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Mr Barry Southam [Signature #57]</h1> <p>Fri, 28 Feb 2014 02:31:31 UTC</p> Mr Barry Southam, Creekmoor Poole </article> <article> <h1>Mr Stuart Regler [Signature #56]</h1> <p>Thu, 27 Feb 2014 06:38:25 UTC</p> Mr Stuart Regler, Blandford Forum, Dorset, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>miss natasha churchouse [Signature #55]</h1> <p>Thu, 27 Feb 2014 05:05:07 UTC</p> miss natasha churchouse, wimborne, Dorset, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Miss Anonymous [Signature #54]</h1> <p>Thu, 27 Feb 2014 04:11:07 UTC</p> Anonymous, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>MR Tim Lees [Signature #53]</h1> <p>Thu, 27 Feb 2014 03:12:05 UTC</p> MR Tim Lees, CREEKMOOR, POOLE, DORSET, United Kingdom<p>I think it is disgusting that the council forbid anyone from purchasing the site at creekmoor due to hazardous debris and methane in the ground. but if they want to put a travellers site on it they can do it with hardly any consultation. It is DISGUSTING! We want something that is of benefit to Poole, like a buisness that brings jobs to the town, or houses that are there for young people or first time buyers can afford. Not a site for travellers that has annual running costs and no income. Also remeber all this recent flooding... That land at Marshes end is Holes bay flood plain and out of the choices should stay that way.... I am Appalled at the councils attitude.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Anonymous [Signature #52]</h1> <p>Tue, 11 Feb 2014 04:41:10 UTC</p> Anonymous, Creekmoor<p>Totally opposed to travellers in Poole. The crime rate, mess and total inconvenience to residents is unacceptable. Councils SHOULD NOT allow travellers sites to go ahead without the consent of those of us living in the immediate area, you can guarantee they don't so it doesn't affect them. THIS IS TOTALLY UNFAIR</p> </article> <article> <h1>Mr Robert Potter [Signature #51]</h1> <p>Wed, 5 Feb 2014 01:26:52 UTC</p> Mr Robert Potter, Poole, uk, United Kingdom<p>we do not want them destroying our country side</p> </article> <article> <h1>Claire Young [Signature #50]</h1> <p>Tue, 4 Feb 2014 11:32:53 UTC</p> Claire Young, Bournemouth, Dorset, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Anonymous [Signature #49]</h1> <p>Tue, 4 Feb 2014 07:46:23 UTC</p> Anonymous, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Mrs Thelma Hendy [Signature #48]</h1> <p>Tue, 4 Feb 2014 01:22:57 UTC</p> Mrs Thelma Hendy, Poole, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>mr lawrence pimenta [Signature #47]</h1> <p>Sat, 1 Feb 2014 05:47:52 UTC</p> mr lawrence pimenta, new milton, US Customers only, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Mrs Dorothy Divall [Signature #46]</h1> <p>Thu, 30 Jan 2014 04:20:56 UTC</p> Mrs Dorothy Divall, Poole, UK, United Kingdom<p>we tried before to house them on a site at Tower Park and they simply wrecked the place. Toilets etc were put in for them and they stole all the copper and fitting and smash them all up it took thousands to sort it out so why should we start again.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Mrs Anonymous [Signature #45]</h1> <p>Thu, 30 Jan 2014 12:29:15 UTC</p> Anonymous, POOLE, Dorset </article> <article> <h1>Mrs Jennifer Helyer [Signature #44]</h1> <p>Thu, 30 Jan 2014 10:11:36 UTC</p> Mrs Jennifer Helyer, Branksome, Poole, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>mrs tina helyer [Signature #43]</h1> <p>Thu, 30 Jan 2014 09:22:24 UTC</p> mrs tina helyer, poole, United Kingdom<p>not wanting a travellers site in poole or Bournemouth having been chased by them and their dogs a few years ago and last year they smeared human poo on the kids playground apparatus in poole</p> </article> <article> <h1>Mr Anonymous [Signature #42]</h1> <p>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 06:17:10 UTC</p> Anonymous, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Mr Anonymous [Signature #41]</h1> <p>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 10:14:53 UTC</p> Anonymous </article> <article> <h1>ms Anonymous [Signature #40]</h1> <p>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 02:36:39 UTC</p> Anonymous, wareham, dorset, England </article> <article> <h1>Miss Carolyne Banks [Signature #39]</h1> <p>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 06:36:20 UTC</p> Miss Carolyne Banks </article> <article> <h1>Carol Crisp [Signature #38]</h1> <p>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 09:04:09 UTC</p> Carol Crisp </article> <article> <h1>Alan Crisp [Signature #37]</h1> <p>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 02:10:04 UTC</p> Alan Crisp </article> <article> <h1>Mrs Angela Crabtree [Signature #36]</h1> <p>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 01:49:04 UTC</p> Mrs Angela Crabtree, Bere regis Wareham, Dorset, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Mr Paul Bailey [Signature #35]</h1> <p>Wed, 9 Nov 2011 03:03:39 UTC</p> Mr Paul Bailey, Bournmemouth, United Kingdom<p>I am totally against these proposed sites around my area. These people do not look after any thing they are given , they just cause inconvenience to local people and cause trouble not to mention the mess that they seem to leave we're ever they go , Tarmac , nappies, rubbish all will have to be cleaned up by us the tax payer. I haven't got a problem with how people live their lives but not at the expense of the majority .</p> </article> <article> <h1>Mrs Wendy Bailey [Signature #34]</h1> <p>Wed, 9 Nov 2011 02:51:58 UTC</p> Mrs Wendy Bailey, Muscliff, bournemouth, Dorset, United Kingdom<p>no to proposed gypsy/traveller site, this will cause more strain on the local amenities. Living in such a picturesque area this will cause damage and problems to the green belt land and nature reserves. Increased litter and crime rate. We pay taxes and the burden this will cause of the council will be huge (at our expense)! No no no! I have a baby who will grow up in this area which we love and enjoy I feel it is my right to protect this area not only for me but for her future!</p> </article> <article> <h1>Ms JA Houldey [Signature #33]</h1> <p>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 07:12:21 UTC</p> Ms JA Houldey, Throop Village<p>Bmth Council - please have some respect for law abiding, rate-paying citizens - and say NO!</p> </article> <article> <h1>Mr Anonymous [Signature #32]</h1> <p>Sun, 30 Oct 2011 06:51:51 UTC</p> Anonymous, Muscliff, Dorset, United Kingdom<p>This is green belt landl. If any member of the settled community decided to build on it we would feel the full force of the law. But there is one set of rules for us and another for travellers and councillors. Not to mention the extra strain on the local schools and the negative impact on house prices in an already struggling market. The law has changed and the council has no obligation to provide these sites now. Voters should vote accordingly at the next elections if these sites so ahead!!!</p> </article> <article> <h1>Mr John Baldry [Signature #31]</h1> <p>Sun, 30 Oct 2011 06:36:00 UTC</p> Mr John Baldry, Ferndown, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>mrs rayna warriner [Signature #30]</h1> <p>Sun, 30 Oct 2011 05:59:58 UTC</p> mrs rayna warriner, bournemouth </article> <article> <h1>Miss Claire Thackray [Signature #29]</h1> <p>Sun, 30 Oct 2011 05:12:12 UTC</p> Miss Claire Thackray, Pontefract, West Yorks, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>mrs Jackie Ball [Signature #28]</h1> <p>Sun, 30 Oct 2011 04:48:52 UTC</p> mrs Jackie Ball, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Mr Anonymous [Signature #27]</h1> <p>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 01:30:56 UTC</p> Anonymous, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Mrs Susan Aston [Signature #26]</h1> <p>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 01:19:51 UTC</p> Mrs Susan Aston, Bournemouth, Dorset </article> <article> <h1>mr chris cole [Signature #25]</h1> <p>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 12:54:13 UTC</p> mr chris cole, bournemouth, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Mrs Hannah Aston [Signature #24]</h1> <p>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 11:00:06 UTC</p> Mrs Hannah Aston, Bournemouth, Dorset, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Mr Timothy Aston [Signature #23]</h1> <p>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 09:19:16 UTC</p> Mr Timothy Aston, Bournemouth, Dorset, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Mrs Barbara Parsons [Signature #22]</h1> <p>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 10:49:52 UTC</p> Mrs Barbara Parsons, Throop Bournemouth, Dorset<p>Not a suitable area, schools already over subscribed.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Robin Garside [Signature #21]</h1> <p>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 11:04:29 UTC</p> Robin Garside, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>sharon lyttle [Signature #20]</h1> <p>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 04:19:16 UTC</p> sharon lyttle, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Mr Michael Peach [Signature #19]</h1> <p>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 01:35:41 UTC</p> Mr Michael Peach, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>miss Donna Wood [Signature #18]</h1> <p>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 01:08:24 UTC</p> miss Donna Wood, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Mr Rich Mellor-Young [Signature #17]</h1> <p>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 11:55:27 UTC</p> Mr Rich Mellor-Young, Bournemouth, Dorset, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Mrs Anonymous [Signature #16]</h1> <p>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:39:00 UTC</p> Anonymous, bournemouth, United Kingdom<p>I HAVE LIVED WITHIN THE THROOP AREA MOST OF MY LIFE AND HAVE ENJOYED LOVELY WALKS DOWN THE AREA WHERE THEY ARE PROPOSING THESE SITES. I HOPED TO BE ABLE TO SHARE THE SAME MEMORIES WITH MY DAUGHTERS HOWEVER IF THESE SITES GO AHEAD THIS IS A DREAM THAT WILL NEVER HAPPEN. THIS IS SUCH A LOVELY AREA AND THERE IS MUCH CONCERN ABOUT THE ENVIRONMENT AND HOW THESE SITES WILL AFFECT IT</p> </article> <article> <h1>Mrs Vicki Mellor-Young [Signature #15]</h1> <p>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 05:17:54 UTC</p> Mrs Vicki Mellor-Young<p>Horse riding through the Arboretum next to Erlin Farm last Sun I saw two signs that were taken down by B'mth Council very soon after. The first read 'Dale Farm No. 2', the second alongside it read 'Muscliffe 0, Travellers 1; move over Muscliffe we're finally coming at last'. The sentiments behind those signs the council didn't want you to see are exactly why this musn't be allowed to happen in our neighbourhood. Also all our houses will lose considerable value, pushing many into negative equity.</p> </article> <article> <h1>mrs Anonymous [Signature #14]</h1> <p>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 01:55:57 UTC</p> Anonymous, bournemouth, dorset, United Kingdom<p>Every year travellers come to Bournemouth in the summer leaving nothing but a huge mess for us to clear up they have no respect for our beautiful countryside & community and now u want to make this a permenant way of life for locals. Its utterly disgusting they give nothing to the community and yet again we're expected to pay for them. if they can afford massive wedding dresses then they can afford to pay rent to park there caravans or rent a house like the rest of us.</p> </article> <article> <h1>MRS Laura Spencer [Signature #13]</h1> <p>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 03:40:09 UTC</p> MRS Laura Spencer, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Mr Richard Spinks [Signature #12]</h1> <p>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 03:38:10 UTC</p> Mr Richard Spinks, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Miss Anonymous [Signature #11]</h1> <p>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 12:29:27 UTC</p> Anonymous, Bournemouth, dorset, United Kingdom<p>We live in a nice family orientated area with good local schools. I do not want this to be ruined by potential gypsy camps. I am most upset about the prospect of this happening to our communitly.</p> </article> <article> <h1>miss RUTH DAWKINS [Signature #10]</h1> <p>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 12:10:10 UTC</p> miss RUTH DAWKINS, THROOP BOURNEMOUTH, DORSET<p>I have lived in Throop in a new build house for8years and walk my 2 big dogs along Muscliffe lane ,down to the river along by Erlin farm every day !The thought of loosing this lovely walk to travellers is an outrage and a big kick inthe teeth to everyone who lives in this extraordinary countryside!Please DO NOT allow this to happen!!!</p> </article> <article> <h1>mrs polly girling [Signature #9]</h1> <p>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:03:42 UTC</p> mrs polly girling, bournemouth, England </article> <article> <h1>Mr Anonymous [Signature #8]</h1> <p>Sun, 9 Oct 2011 02:47:14 UTC</p> Anonymous </article> <article> <h1>MrS Anonymous [Signature #7]</h1> <p>Sun, 9 Oct 2011 07:27:30 UTC</p> Anonymous, United Kingdom </article> <article> <h1>Miss Anonymous [Signature #6]</h1> <p>Wed, 5 Oct 2011 04:20:04 UTC</p> Anonymous </article> <article> <h1>mr Oliver Dubois [Signature #5]</h1> <p>Sat, 1 Oct 2011 11:44:27 UTC</p> mr Oliver Dubois, Bournemouth, United Kingdom<p>The idea of an official, perminant site for travellers seems like a contracdiction. they do not contribute to the region or pay tax and choose not to be part of normal society, so why should they be entitled to the same rights as us but with zero responcibility. it would damage tourism and house prices for home owners in these areas.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Amanda Macfarlane [Signature #4]</h1> <p>Sat, 1 Oct 2011 03:51:50 UTC</p> Amanda Macfarlane </article> <article> <h1>Helen Ricketts [Signature #3]</h1> <p>Sat, 1 Oct 2011 03:49:50 UTC</p> Helen Ricketts </article> <article> <h1>Shelly Walker [Signature #2]</h1> <p>Sat, 1 Oct 2011 03:47:51 UTC</p> Shelly Walker </article> <article> <h1>Miss Nicki Macfarlane [Signature #1]</h1> <p>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 04:13:23 UTC</p> Miss Nicki Macfarlane, United Kingdom<p>NO TO TRAVELLERS SITES</p> </article> </main></body></html>