Support Lidl Richmond - Development Option 1 Petition: Signature List Feed http://www.gopetition.com/signatures/support-lidl-richmond-development-option-1.html Online petition signatures en-us Mon, 6 Apr 2026 01:07 UTC GoPetition RSS Feed Generator Copyright 2026 GoPetition Anonymous [Signature #82] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21317723?utm_medium=rss Sat, 6 May 2017 01:38:19 UTC 21317723 Anonymous [Signature #81] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21315104?utm_medium=rss Fri, 5 May 2017 11:26:48 UTC 21315104 Anonymous [Signature #80] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21300472?utm_medium=rss Tue, 2 May 2017 11:34:35 UTC 21300472 Peter Fawcett [Signature #79] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21300458?utm_medium=rss I agree this option is much more user friendly especially for older people

]]> Tue, 2 May 2017 11:32:36 UTC 21300458 Anonymous [Signature #78] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21298274?utm_medium=rss Tue, 2 May 2017 01:55:39 UTC 21298274 Anonymous [Signature #77] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21292664?utm_medium=rss Option 1 has the better carpark design. Not so sure about the very small patches of grass though - will these just become strips of mud when people walk over them - how often will they be cut or re-seeded? Not sure if it would look better without them in the longer term.

Personally I think the front should have more glass. If we can have that monstrosity on the front of the Georgian Theatre, Planners should be saying yes to this building! I like the glass frontage on the Stockton branch of lidl (and the range of goods that it sells!) I think lidl will make a great asset to richmond.

]]> Fri, 28 Apr 2017 10:25:47 UTC 21292664 Stephen Corner [Signature #76] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21292355?utm_medium=rss Sooner the better. Living in Richmond we need a supermarket locally

]]> Fri, 28 Apr 2017 07:03:48 UTC 21292355 Anonymous [Signature #75] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21290916?utm_medium=rss This layout would remove a good deal of the dangers of the present car park layout for drivers and pedestrians.

]]> Thu, 27 Apr 2017 03:34:20 UTC 21290916 Anonymous [Signature #74] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21290595?utm_medium=rss Thu, 27 Apr 2017 08:07:45 UTC 21290595 Anonymous [Signature #73] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21288194?utm_medium=rss I opt for option 1 in the consultation document.
Mainly because of how dangerous the current car park surface was in winter

]]> Tue, 25 Apr 2017 05:28:17 UTC 21288194 Anonymous [Signature #72] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21288181?utm_medium=rss Tue, 25 Apr 2017 05:17:24 UTC 21288181 Anonymous [Signature #71] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21287947?utm_medium=rss I am originally from Richmond but my elderly Mum still lives there. The option of a new surface would be good as not easy to push a trolley across this old surface

]]> Tue, 25 Apr 2017 01:59:03 UTC 21287947 Anonymous [Signature #70] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21287853?utm_medium=rss The way it is at the moment due to tight corners and unable to see past the bushes make for difficult manuvering when busy ,much better to be able to see.

]]> Tue, 25 Apr 2017 12:42:21 UTC 21287853 Barbara Potts [Signature #69] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21287809?utm_medium=rss Have you considered offering home delivery like co-op used to do where customers shop but get it delivered?

]]> Tue, 25 Apr 2017 12:04:19 UTC 21287809 Anonymous [Signature #68] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21287731?utm_medium=rss Tue, 25 Apr 2017 10:17:27 UTC 21287731 Anonymous [Signature #67] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21286824?utm_medium=rss option 1 will make it easier to drive around and use trolleys.

]]> Mon, 24 Apr 2017 09:52:32 UTC 21286824 Anonymous [Signature #66] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21286629?utm_medium=rss Mon, 24 Apr 2017 07:29:06 UTC 21286629 Anonymous [Signature #65] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21286499?utm_medium=rss Mon, 24 Apr 2017 05:28:11 UTC 21286499 Anonymous [Signature #64] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21286459?utm_medium=rss Mon, 24 Apr 2017 04:35:55 UTC 21286459 Philip Digan [Signature #63] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21285987?utm_medium=rss Mon, 24 Apr 2017 08:08:29 UTC 21285987 Anonymous [Signature #62] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21285971?utm_medium=rss Mon, 24 Apr 2017 07:46:23 UTC 21285971 Judith Robinson [Signature #61] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21285969?utm_medium=rss Mon, 24 Apr 2017 07:42:55 UTC 21285969 Anonymous [Signature #60] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21285439?utm_medium=rss Prefer fewer, larger bays.

]]> Sun, 23 Apr 2017 09:24:03 UTC 21285439 Eric Jarvis [Signature #59] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21285280?utm_medium=rss Sun, 23 Apr 2017 06:35:28 UTC 21285280 Anonymous [Signature #58] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21285056?utm_medium=rss Sun, 23 Apr 2017 02:11:47 UTC 21285056 Anonymous [Signature #57] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21285051?utm_medium=rss Sun, 23 Apr 2017 02:03:38 UTC 21285051 Susan lerigo [Signature #56] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21284856?utm_medium=rss Sun, 23 Apr 2017 11:21:07 UTC 21284856 Elizabeth Burton [Signature #55] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21284631?utm_medium=rss option 1 is a lot better idea, the store cannot be seen anyway unless you are stood in front of it.I am still amazed that snooty Richmond planners agreed to a cheap store in the first place.

]]> Sun, 23 Apr 2017 09:44:32 UTC 21284631 Anonymous [Signature #54] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21284537?utm_medium=rss I support option 1 because the existing car park has deteriorated into a sometimes dangerous place to drive or walk. The block paving is loose and slippery when wet or covered in snow or frost, the hedges at the ends of the parking lanes are overgrown making it virtually impossible to see vehicles driving into or out of the parking lanes. Option 1 would make maintenance easier for Lidl and visibility far greater for the customers using the car park.
I also feel that the changes being made to the parking area will have little or no impact on the area visually or environmentally.

]]> Sun, 23 Apr 2017 08:53:35 UTC 21284537 Bronia Gardner [Signature #53] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21284496?utm_medium=rss Sun, 23 Apr 2017 08:01:29 UTC 21284496 Anonymous [Signature #52] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21284470?utm_medium=rss Sun, 23 Apr 2017 07:24:20 UTC 21284470 Anonymous [Signature #51] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21284439?utm_medium=rss Sun, 23 Apr 2017 06:48:50 UTC 21284439 Anonymous [Signature #50] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21284436?utm_medium=rss Sun, 23 Apr 2017 06:46:57 UTC 21284436 Anonymous [Signature #49] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21284428?utm_medium=rss Sun, 23 Apr 2017 06:42:07 UTC 21284428 Anonymous [Signature #48] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21284119?utm_medium=rss Option 1 is the better option for the new store. Bringing a fresh, clean and modern vibe whilst being sympathetic to the surrounding area.

]]> Sat, 22 Apr 2017 11:39:13 UTC 21284119 Carolyn Ellis [Signature #47] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21284063?utm_medium=rss Car park more family friendly.

]]> Sat, 22 Apr 2017 10:43:18 UTC 21284063 Susan Forster [Signature #46] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21284018?utm_medium=rss Sat, 22 Apr 2017 09:55:51 UTC 21284018 Lisa Treacy [Signature #45] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21283938?utm_medium=rss Sat, 22 Apr 2017 08:50:40 UTC 21283938 Anonymous [Signature #44] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21283902?utm_medium=rss Option 1 seems more practical, the existing car park has been impractical for a long time.

]]> Sat, 22 Apr 2017 08:16:46 UTC 21283902 Andrea Wallet [Signature #43] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21283897?utm_medium=rss Great idea to get rid of the cobbles/stone.

]]> Sat, 22 Apr 2017 08:11:46 UTC 21283897 Lia Martinucci [Signature #42] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21283877?utm_medium=rss Let's move forward! This building as it is is of no architectural value. Why not have a 21st century foot print visible. Ie. The full glass option and carpark one.

If it is appropriate for the glass window and treatment to the Royal Georgian Theatre then why not to this most unremarkable old supermarket?

]]> Sat, 22 Apr 2017 07:55:04 UTC 21283877 Anonymous [Signature #41] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21283864?utm_medium=rss Sat, 22 Apr 2017 07:40:39 UTC 21283864 Anonymous [Signature #40] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21283833?utm_medium=rss Sat, 22 Apr 2017 07:07:29 UTC 21283833 Anonymous [Signature #39] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21283811?utm_medium=rss Sat, 22 Apr 2017 06:45:47 UTC 21283811 Anonymous [Signature #38] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21283802?utm_medium=rss Definitely need more than 7 disabled bays at the store and longer/wider spaces sound a lot more attractive than keeping the current configuration

]]> Sat, 22 Apr 2017 06:36:57 UTC 21283802 Michael Forster [Signature #37] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21283797?utm_medium=rss Just get it done! Richmond desperately needs a supermarket

]]> Sat, 22 Apr 2017 06:35:04 UTC 21283797 Anonymous [Signature #36] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21283794?utm_medium=rss we need parent and child parking

]]> Sat, 22 Apr 2017 06:30:59 UTC 21283794 Anonymous [Signature #35] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21283787?utm_medium=rss Current car parking spaces are too small.

]]> Sat, 22 Apr 2017 06:24:11 UTC 21283787 Anonymous [Signature #34] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21283781?utm_medium=rss The most sensible proposal by a mile

]]> Sat, 22 Apr 2017 06:17:33 UTC 21283781 Laurence Lines [Signature #33] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21283773?utm_medium=rss Option 1 by a mile don't let the town or district council grind you down this has to happen can't wait for your store to open long overdue

]]> Sat, 22 Apr 2017 06:07:27 UTC 21283773 Anonymous [Signature #32] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21283766?utm_medium=rss Sat, 22 Apr 2017 06:04:44 UTC 21283766 Anonymous [Signature #31] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21283751?utm_medium=rss Please redo the car park for the new store to option 1 on your suggested plans

]]> Sat, 22 Apr 2017 05:49:24 UTC 21283751 Anonymous [Signature #30] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21283716?utm_medium=rss The current car park surface is dangerous, especially to the elderly, infirm and youngsters. It is also extremely slippery in wet/icy weather and needs to be replaced.
Also, as it currently is, it is very difficult to see the outlines between each bay which means there are vehicles randomly parked.

]]> Sat, 22 Apr 2017 05:13:55 UTC 21283716 Anonymous [Signature #29] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21283706?utm_medium=rss Sat, 22 Apr 2017 05:06:00 UTC 21283706 Fiona Simms [Signature #28] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21283680?utm_medium=rss Sat, 22 Apr 2017 04:46:02 UTC 21283680 Anonymous [Signature #27] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21283678?utm_medium=rss Sat, 22 Apr 2017 04:44:58 UTC 21283678 Peter Ellis [Signature #26] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21283675?utm_medium=rss Car park 1 seems to be the more user friendly

]]> Sat, 22 Apr 2017 04:36:57 UTC 21283675 Joanne Beswick [Signature #25] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21283674?utm_medium=rss Sat, 22 Apr 2017 04:36:45 UTC 21283674 Trevor Cook [Signature #24] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21283671?utm_medium=rss Sat, 22 Apr 2017 04:33:54 UTC 21283671 david bray [Signature #23] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21283664?utm_medium=rss 1 is better option hate minute parking spaces too often cars are damaged like at tesco.

]]> Sat, 22 Apr 2017 04:28:20 UTC 21283664 rosemary Waite [Signature #22] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21283655?utm_medium=rss Sat, 22 Apr 2017 04:19:05 UTC 21283655 Paul Thwaite [Signature #21] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21283645?utm_medium=rss Sat, 22 Apr 2017 04:08:56 UTC 21283645 Anonymous [Signature #20] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21283638?utm_medium=rss Sat, 22 Apr 2017 04:06:56 UTC 21283638 Anonymous [Signature #19] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21283615?utm_medium=rss Car park 1

]]> Sat, 22 Apr 2017 03:48:58 UTC 21283615 Anonymous [Signature #18] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21283613?utm_medium=rss Fully support option 1.

]]> Sat, 22 Apr 2017 03:46:42 UTC 21283613 Anonymous [Signature #17] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21283608?utm_medium=rss Much better option than the alternative. The existing car park is dangerous with limited visibility

]]> Sat, 22 Apr 2017 03:43:46 UTC 21283608 Anonymous [Signature #16] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21283594?utm_medium=rss Sat, 22 Apr 2017 03:35:42 UTC 21283594 Anonymous [Signature #15] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21283555?utm_medium=rss Sat, 22 Apr 2017 03:01:39 UTC 21283555 Anonymous [Signature #14] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21283409?utm_medium=rss Cant wait for the new store to open.we have one 3 miles away but this one is closer to home.

]]> Sat, 22 Apr 2017 12:41:45 UTC 21283409 Anonymous [Signature #13] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21283385?utm_medium=rss Yes want Lidl, will benefit us, open quickly please, and favour Option 1 because parking needs improI ving and spaces need expanding.

]]> Sat, 22 Apr 2017 12:16:34 UTC 21283385 Anonymous [Signature #12] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21283364?utm_medium=rss Having 2 trolley bays makes it easier for shoppers, and having tarmac will be quieter than the current surface and more disabled bays.

]]> Sat, 22 Apr 2017 11:57:13 UTC 21283364 Anonymous [Signature #11] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21283303?utm_medium=rss Sat, 22 Apr 2017 09:35:18 UTC 21283303 Anonymous [Signature #10] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21282128?utm_medium=rss Fri, 21 Apr 2017 05:55:42 UTC 21282128 Craig Brown [Signature #9] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21282010?utm_medium=rss I fully support option 1 changes, the current car park is not well laid out and bags are not clear. Lighting is poor on dark nights and the building is in great need of modernisation. My only thought is if there is to be a pay and display (i.e. For customers only) parking or it remain as it is? I am a loyal customer at the other local catterick store and worry I may not be able to shop during 'busy' periods as others will be using the car park to shop in town as they have always done so rather than shop in store...I am aware this will be one of the major contentious areas for discussion.

]]> Fri, 21 Apr 2017 04:43:03 UTC 21282010 Richard Haynes [Signature #8] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21281937?utm_medium=rss As someone with a severe sight imparement this option improves my ability to navigate safely around the site. Having parking bays clearly marked/defined will ensure drivers park appropriate which is not the case at present with bays that are not clearly marked on the current surface.

]]> Fri, 21 Apr 2017 03:51:50 UTC 21281937 Michelle Garner [Signature #7] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21281914?utm_medium=rss Option looks like a more customer friendly option mainly that it will be easier to park.

]]> Fri, 21 Apr 2017 03:39:37 UTC 21281914 Anonymous [Signature #6] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21281711?utm_medium=rss Option 1 brings a modern and contemporary look to a building which looks tired and dated along with a greatly needed uplift of what can only be described as a un safe worn and dangerous car park. From a majority perspective of the younger generation , Richmondshire council need to progress forwards with modernisation "within reason" of the town and stop living in the stone age by rejecting just about every proposal put forwards for the town to be improved. By having a Lidyl in the town will greatly improve the number of visiting people to the town from the surrounding area simply by offering a widerange and quality products at cheaper prices compared to that of the more expensive Co-op.

]]> Fri, 21 Apr 2017 01:31:45 UTC 21281711 John Barlow [Signature #5] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21281697?utm_medium=rss Prefer option 1
Trust the store will provide smaller trolleys & baskets for older customers.

]]> Fri, 21 Apr 2017 01:24:59 UTC 21281697 Craig Jessup [Signature #4] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21281671?utm_medium=rss Richmond is not famous for these car park cobbles; modernisation is the way to go!

]]> Fri, 21 Apr 2017 01:03:23 UTC 21281671 Anonymous [Signature #3] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21281650?utm_medium=rss This sounds like a sensible solution

]]> Fri, 21 Apr 2017 12:51:41 UTC 21281650 Anonymous [Signature #2] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21281645?utm_medium=rss I feel that option 1 is better suited to accommodate the elderly and more infirm customers making it the better and safer option.

]]> Fri, 21 Apr 2017 12:48:48 UTC 21281645 Anonymous [Signature #1] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/21281589?utm_medium=rss Fri, 21 Apr 2017 11:55:24 UTC 21281589